摘要
目的观察经皮穴位电刺激对粘连期肩周炎的治疗作用及与电针治疗的效应异同。方法采用规范化、标准化的诊断和疗效评价标准,明确和固定各治疗参数,以肩部疼痛和肩关节活动为观察指标,194例粘连期肩关节周围炎患者分别进行经皮穴位电刺激和电针治疗。结果经皮穴位电刺激对粘连期肩周炎的总有效率达到96·9%,电针刺激对粘连期肩周炎的总有效率达到97·9%,2组比较无明显差异;经皮穴位电刺激疗法不仅能有效止痛,对粘连期的肩关节活动障碍也有明显的改善作用。结论经皮穴位电刺激为治疗肩周炎有效、简便的疗法。
[Objective] To observe clinical therapeutic effect of transcutaneous electrical point stimulation （TEPS） on scapulohumer al periarthritis of adhersion type. [Methods] Criteria of standardized diagnosis and assessment of therapeutic effects were adopted, various treatment parameters were fixed, and pain of shoulder and activity of shoulder joint were taken as observed indexes, TEPS and electroacupuncture （EA） were applied respectively in the treatment of 194 cases of scapulohumeral periarthritis of adhersion type. [Results]TEPS and EA had a similar good therapeutic effect, with the total effective rat 96.9% and 97.9% separately. TEPS could improve both pain index and activity of shoulder joint. [Conclusion] TEPS is a better therapy for scapulohumeral peri arthritis of adhersion type, with ease of administration.
出处
《浙江中医药大学学报》
CAS
2006年第5期520-521,共2页
Journal of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University
关键词
肩关节周围炎
经皮穴位电刺激
电针
粘连期
scapulohumeral periarthritis
transcutaneous electrical point stimulation
electroacupuncture
adhersion type
