期刊文献+

Comparison Research on Anti-dumping Duty Rates between Administrative Review and Welfare Maximization under Dynamic Game of Perfect Information

Comparison Research on Anti-dumping Duty Rates between Administrative Review and Welfare Maximization under Dynamic Game of Perfect Information
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Using economics and game theory, two kinds of models have been proposed in this paper under the assumption that foreign and domestic firms behave under the condition of dynamic game of perfect information. One model is for calculating Anti-dumping rate which is obtained according to current regulations of Anti-dumping, but it is not optimal. The other is an optimal model of Anti-dumping which is obtained according to the maximum principle of domestic social welfare. Then, through the comparison of this two models in detail, several shortages have been revealed about Anti-dumping rate model based on current regulations of Anti-dumping. Finally, a suggestion is indicated that WTO and China should use the optimal model to calculate Anti-dumping rate. Using economics and game theory, two kinds of models have been proposed in this paper under the assumption that foreign and domestic firms behave under the condition of dynamic game of perfect information. One model is for calculating Anti-dumping rate which is obtained according to current regulations of Anti-dumping, but it is not optimal. The other is an optimal model of Anti-dumping which is obtained according to the maximum principle of domestic social welfare. Then, through the comparison of this two models in detail, several shortages have been revealed about Anti-dumping rate model based on current regulations of Anti-dumping. Finally, a suggestion is indicated that WTO and China should use the optimal model to calculate Antidumping rate.
出处 《Journal of Donghua University(English Edition)》 EI CAS 2006年第3期127-130,共4页 东华大学学报(英文版)
关键词 administrative review Anti-dumping rate dynamic game perfect information. 行政规章 反倾销比率 动态博弈 完全信息 贸易保护
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Zhang Weiying.Game theory and information economics[]..1996 被引量:1
  • 2Staiger Robert W,Frank A Wolak.Brookings Papers on Economics Activity : Microeconomics[]..1994 被引量:1
  • 3Krupp Corinne M,Patricia S Pollard. Canadian Journal of Economics . 1996 被引量:1
  • 4Gallaway Michael P,Bruce A. Blonigan,Joseph E. Flynn. Journal of International Economics . 1999 被引量:1
  • 5Zhong GY,Wang FH. Question of International Trade . 2003 被引量:1
  • 6Huang YJ.China Practical Guide of Anti-dumping[]..2001 被引量:1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部