期刊文献+

常用乳腺影像诊断方法的比较研究 被引量:40

Comparative Study on Breast Imaging Diagnostic Methods of Commonly Used
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较彩色多普勒超声、钼靶和近红外线在乳腺癌及乳腺良性疾病诊断中的作用。方法以术后病理结果为金标准,比较术前3种检查方法的诊断准确性。结果共计565例乳腺疾病患者接受检查,其中乳腺癌274例,良性乳腺疾病291例。对乳腺癌彩超、钼靶和近红外线检查的灵敏度分别为83.7%(200/239)、84.2%(64/76)和76.9%(100/130),特异度分别为88.6%(226/255)、93.2%(69/74)和82.6%(114/138),诊断符合率分别为86.2%(426/494)、88.7%(133/150)和79.9%(214/268),其中彩超和钼靶检查的诊断符合率优于近红外线(P<0.05),尤其对≤2cm的乳腺癌,近红外线对其诊断有较高的假阴性率(48.8%,21/43)。对乳腺炎性病变和导管瘤,彩超的检出率分别为58.8%(10/17)和69.2%(18/26),高于近红外线的检出率分别为0和23.5%(4/17),P<0.05和P<0.01。对乳腺癌在无查体配合诊断情况下行近红外线检查,其灵敏度和诊断符合率明显下降灵敏度从76.9%(100/130)降到56.9%(74/130),P<0.01;诊断符合率从79.9%(214/298)降到61.9%(166/268),P<0.01。结论彩色多普勒超声和钼靶是有价值的常用乳腺影像诊断方法。 Objective To compare the accuracy of color-doppler ultrasonography, mammography and near-infrared light scanning for diagnosing breast diseases. Methods The diagnostic accuracy of the above three imaging methods were analyzed and compared with each other on the basis of the postoperative pathological results. Results Five hundreds and sixty five cases (breast cancer: 274 cases, benign diseases: 291 cases) were examined. The sensitivity of color-doppler ultrasonography, mammography and near infrared light scanning for diagnosing breast cancer were 83.7% (200/239), 84. 2% (64/76) and 76. 9% (100/130), respectively. The specificity were 88. 6% (226/255), 93.2% (69/74) and 82.6% (114/138) , and the accuracy were 86.2% (426/494) , 88.7% (133/150) and 79.9% (214/268), respectively. Color doppler ultrasonography and mammography were superior to near-infrared light in the item of accuracy (P〈0.05), especially for lesions of breast cancers that were less than 2 cm. The false negative rate of near-infrared light was higher (48.8% , 21/43)than those of the other methods in detecting breast cancer at early stage. The sensitivity for detecting intraductal papilloma and inflammation of breast using colordoppler ultrasonography were 58. 8%(10/17) and 69. 2% (18/26), respectively, which were higher than that of near-infrared light scanning [0 and 23.5% (4/17), P〈0.05 and P〈0.01]. The sensitivity and the accuracy of near infrared light without physical examination reduced significantly, in which the sensitivity reduced from 76. 9% (100/130) to 56.9% (74/130), P〈0.01, and the accuracy reduced from 79. 9% (214/298) to 61. 9% (166/268), P〈0.01. Conclusion Color-doppler ultrasonography and mammography are accurate imaging methods for diagnosing breast diseases.
出处 《中国普外基础与临床杂志》 CAS 2006年第5期576-579,共4页 Chinese Journal of Bases and Clinics In General Surgery
基金 北京市科委乳腺癌危险评估专项基金(编号:H02022140190)
关键词 乳腺 彩色多普勒超声 钼靶 近红外线 Breast Color doppler ultrasonography Mammography Near-infrared light scanning
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1张明满,高根五,余永康,邹建中,谢昭鹏,廖翠蓉.近红外线扫描与彩色多普勒超声对乳腺肿块诊断的临床评价[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2001,8(5):326-328. 被引量:12
  • 2刘锦平,李春梅,夏天,王孙庆.近红外线扫描及彩色多普勒超声对乳腺癌的诊断价值比较[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,1998,5(5):303-303. 被引量:2
  • 3胡永升著..现代乳腺影像诊断学[M].北京:科学出版社,2001:439.
  • 4王建华主编..实用医学科研方法[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:523.
  • 5Schulz-Wendtland R, Bock K, Aichinger U, et al. Ultrasound examination of the breast with 7.5 MHz and 13 MHz-transducers: scope for improving diagnostic accuracy in complementary breast diagnostics?[J]. Ultraschall Med, 2005; 26(3): 209 被引量:1
  • 6Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer [J]. Radiology,2004; 233(3):830 被引量:1
  • 7Boehm T, Hochmuth A, Malich A, et al. Contrast-enhanced near-infrared laser mammography with a prototype breast scanner: feasibility study with tissue phantoms and preliminary results of imaging experimental tumors [J]. Invest Radiol, 2001;36(10) : 573 被引量:1

二级参考文献5

共引文献12

同被引文献1832

引证文献40

二级引证文献276

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部