期刊文献+

清末“急务”与“本源”的失调——以鸦片禁政期间的财政窘况为背景 被引量:3

The Unbalance of “Urgent task” and “Ultimate Source” In Late Qing Dynasty: Based on the Financial Exhaustion during the Period of Opium-Banning
原文传递
导出
摘要 清末新政时期的编练新军和振兴实业分别被谕旨称为“急务”和“本源”,这是新政时期国家振兴的重要国策。两项国策的推行均需要有大量的财政投入。由于推行鸦片禁政,国产和进口鸦片税厘大幅度缩减,影响了中央和地方财政的拓展。在清廷的督催下,练兵新政不断得到强化,成为中央和地方财政支出的大项,这必然导致振兴实业因缺少足够的资金注入和宽松的税收环境而举步维艰。尤其是在制定国家预算的过程中,海陆军经费占据了国家财政预算相当高的比例,振兴实业这一国策在财政预算中并未明显地体现出来,形成了练兵“急务”突出,而实业“本源”却不断弱化的现实,两者在财政困绌条件下事实上处于“失衡”状态。朝野各方由此对军政失调、过分突出军备的倾向颇有微词,尤以各种报章的批评言论最为尖锐,国外人士对清廷推行新政中本末倒置现象的批评性观点也通过各种途径体现出来。清亡的原因也可借此得到一定的解释。 New-Army-Building and Industry-Boosting were regarded by emperors as the "urgent task" and "ultimate source" respectively during the period of New Deal in the end of the Qing Dynasty, and these were the important policies for the rising of whole country. Such policies needed a great amount of money to put into effect, but Opium-Banning heavily decreased both domestic and foreign opium tax, put its impact on the expanding of both the central and local financial gains. Under the pressure of central court, the policy of New-Army-Building was emphasized and became a big item of financial payout, while industry was difficult to boosting as a result of shortage of investment and heavy tax. Military outlay of navy and land army took a high percentage of national financial budgets, while the policy of industry-boosting was not outstanding in the same budgets. The "urgent task" as emphasized while the "ultimate source" was weakened. These two were out of balance under the financial difficulty. Such unbalance of military and civil policy and over-emphasis of armament were criticized by both the government and the public, and the criticism on various newspapers was especially acute. Criticisms from some foreigners were also reflected through various media. That might provide some interpretation for the finally fall of Qing Dynasty.
作者 刘增合
机构地区 暨南大学历史系
出处 《学术月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第9期142-149,共8页 Academic Monthly
关键词 清末练兵 振兴实业 清末财政 清末禁烟 New-Amy-Building, Industry-Boosting, finance, Opium-Banning
  • 相关文献

参考文献74

  • 1朱寿朋编..光绪朝东华录 光绪十四年1888年光绪二十年1894年第3册[M].北京:中华书局,1958:2407-3534.
  • 2中国史学会编..辛亥革命与20世纪的中国 中[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2002.
  • 3《咨请各省筹补药税》.《大公报》,1909年4月3日. 被引量:2
  • 4许珏.《後庵遗集》,第431—434、470-471、485页,台北,成文出版社,1970. 被引量:1
  • 5刘锦藻:《清朝续文献通考》,商务印书馆1936年版,第9497页. 被引量:4
  • 6Srinivas R. Wagel, Finance in China, p. 339, pp. 347-348,上海,1914. 被引量:1
  • 7汪敬虞主编.《中国近代经济史(1895-1927)》,第1334页,北京,人民出版社,2000. 被引量:2
  • 8田海林,张志勇.《禁烟新政与清王朝的覆亡》. 被引量:1
  • 9汤象龙编著..中国近代海关税收和分配统计 1861-1910[M].北京:中华书局,1992:551.
  • 10刘增合.《清末禁烟时期的鸦片统税纠纷》[J].中央研究院近代史研究所集刊,台北,2004,(45). 被引量:1

共引文献25

同被引文献354

引证文献3

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部