摘要
20世纪中期开始的第一次区域化活动在70年代进入低潮。从80年代开始,第二次区域化浪潮呈愈演愈烈之势。科斯、诺斯和哈耶克等人的理论认为,差异性不仅决定着区域经济组织的共同目标(本文中指一体化程度),还决定着其规模。本文选用人均GDP方差作为反映区域经济集团内部差异性的指标,对31个区域经济集团进行研究的结果表明,区域经济集团内部的差异性与其一体化程度不具有相关性。最后,通过构建的非线性0-1规划模型,本文定量分析了差异性在决定EU、NAFTA和“10+3”现有(潜在)规模中的作用。
The first campaign of economic regionalization, originating in the middle of 20th century, was nearing an end in late 1970s. From early 1980s＇, the second one has been increasingly dynamic. Coase, North and Hayek argued that disparities in organization determines common objects （refer to the extend of integration in this paper） and its scale. If GDP per capita stands for disparities in regional economic grouping （REG） , researches into 31 REGs show that non-economic factors also determine the extend of integration of REGs. At last, take EU, NAFTA, 10＋3 as examples, this paper quantitatively analyzes the role of disparities in determining the （potential） scale of REG by nonlinear 0-1 programming model.
出处
《国际贸易问题》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第9期27-35,共9页
Journal of International Trade
关键词
人均GDP
差异性
一体化程度
规模
GDP Per capita
Disparities
Extend of integration
Scale
