摘要
荷兰汉学家高罗佩创作的《大唐狄仁杰断案传奇》,改编自清代公案小说《狄公案》。但两者叙事视角的选择截然不同。后者沿袭着中国古代小说传统的全知模式,前者则主要继承了西方侦探小说的限知叙事和纯客观叙事模式,并在一定程度上汲取了中国小说的全知模式,由此将根植于中国俗文学的公案题材进行成功地演绎,为转折之际的小说创作提供了可贵的借鉴。
Judge Dee Mysteries, which is written by Robert Hansvan Gulik, the Dutch Sinologist, is an adaption of Di Gong An which is an novel about legal case in Qing dynasty, but their narrative points of view are different. The latter mainly follows the traditional omniscience pattern, while the former inherits the limited understanding and impersonal discourse pattern in the west whodunits, and sometimes adopts omniscience pattern just as Chinese ancient novels did. In this way, Gulik succeed in paraphrasing the subject matter about legal case which is rooted in Chinese ancient popular literature, and provided a valuable exDerience to the novel＇s writting at the time of turn.
出处
《泉州师范学院学报》
2006年第1期127-133,共7页
Journal of Quanzhou Normal University
关键词
高罗佩
《大唐狄仁杰断案传奇》
全知叙事
限知叙事
纯客观叙事
Gulik
Judge Dee Mysteries
omniscience narrative
the limited understanding narrative
impersonal discourse
