期刊文献+

营销价值观与组织绩效关系的实证研究:兼论企业所有制的影响 被引量:17

Ownership,Marketing Value and Organizational Performance
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文重点讨论了营销学中作为指导企业营销活动的价值观——市场导向与利益相关者导向的理论架构,并检验了利益相关者导向与组织绩效之间的关系。同时,还针对文献中欠缺的中国企业所有制的影响,进行了分析。研究结果发现,利益相关者导向对中国企业的组织绩效具有积极影响。但中国不同所有制的企业,在利益相关者导向和组织绩效上差异很大。 In this paper, the author analyzes the marketing theoretical framework of stakeholder orientation as the value, which guides the marketing activities of firms, and tests the relationship between stakeholder orientation and organizational performance. The impact of ownership of Chinese firms, which is vacant in literature, is also discussed. The research findings show that stakeholder orientation has positive influence on Chinese firms' performance. But firms of different ownership have much variance in their stakeholder orientation and organizational performance.
作者 何新明
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第8期117-124,共8页 China Industrial Economics
关键词 营销价值观 所有制 利益相关者导向 组织绩效 marketing value ownership stakeholder orientation organizational performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1陈工孟.现代企业代理问题和国有企业改革[J].经济研究,1997,32(10):43-45. 被引量:61
  • 2陈宏辉..企业利益相关者的利益要求[M],2004.
  • 3何新明.营销观念:从市场导向到关键利益相关者导向[C].2004JMC中国营销科学学术年会论文集. 被引量:1
  • 4何新明,张双文.利益相关者理论在中国的实证研究基础[J].经济管理,2003,29(19):27-30. 被引量:4
  • 5翁君奕著..商务模式创新 企业经营“魔方”的旋启[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2004:279.
  • 6王世豪.试论国有企业中的委托—代理问题[J].经济体制改革,2000(3):41-44. 被引量:9
  • 7Clarkson,Max B.E.A Stakeholder Framework for Analysing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance[J].Academy of Management Review,1995,(20). 被引量:1
  • 8Darroch,Jenny,Morgan P.Miles,Andrew Jardine,and Ernest F.Cooke.The 2004 AMA Definition of Marketing And Its Relationship to a Market Orientation:An Extension of Cooke,Rayburn,& Abercrombie(1992)[J].Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice,2004,(Fall). 被引量:1
  • 9Deng,Shengliang,and Jack Dart.The Market Orientation of Chinese Enterprises During a Time of Economic Transition[J].European Journal of Marketing,1999,33(5-6). 被引量:1
  • 10Deshpande,Rohit,and John U.Farley.Executive Insights:Corporate Culture and Market Orientation:Comparing Indian and Japanese Firms[J].Journal of International Marketing,1999,(7). 被引量:1

二级参考文献9

  • 1Berman, Shawn L., Andrew C. Wicks, Suresh Kotha and Thomas M. Jones, 1999, Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance, Academy of Management Journal 42. 被引量:1
  • 2Cornell, Bradford and Alan C. Shapiro, 1987, Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance, Financial Management 16. 被引量:1
  • 3Clarkson, Max B E, 1995, A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance, Academy of Management Review 20. 被引量:1
  • 4Donaldson, Thomas and Lee E. Preston, 1995, The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidences and implications, Academy of Management Journal 27. 被引量:1
  • 5Freeman, R Edward, 1984, Strategic Management: A stakeholder Approach, Pitman Publishing Inc. 被引量:1
  • 6Jones, Thomas M and Andrew C Wicks, 1999, Convergent stakeholder Theory, Academy of Management Review 24. 被引量:1
  • 7Waddock, Sandra A. and Samuel B. Graves, 1997 Quality of management and quality of stakeholder relations Are they synonymous? Business and Society 36. 被引量:1
  • 8Mitchell, Ronald K., Bradley R. Agle, and Donna J. Wood, 1997, Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts, Academy of Management Review 22. 被引量:1
  • 9Ruf, Bernadette M., Krishnamurty Muralidhar, and Karen Paul, 1998, The development of a systematic, aggregate measure of corporate social performance, Journal of Management 24. 被引量:1

共引文献71

同被引文献262

引证文献17

二级引证文献124

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部