摘要
韩愈与苏轼博大其文,深邃其思,曰海曰潮均不为过。故学界以“海”、“潮”形之,始称“韩海苏潮”,继谓“韩潮苏海”。称海称潮,位置之变,反映了韩学与苏学界对韩愈、苏轼二人合乎实际的重新认识和了解。韩浑灏流转,势如长江秋注,潮之喻更切;苏海涵地负,澜翻波卷,其博其深非海不足以形之。韩潮苏海内容为何,正是关键之所在。
It＇ profound. So SU Sea. The towards HAN s unexaggerated that HAN Yu and SU Shi＇s essays were appraised as sea and tide for they were wide and the academic circles describe them as sea and tide, calling HAN Sea SU Tide at first and later HAN Tide change of position between sea and tide indicates a more practical and proper recognition of academic circles Yu and SUShi. It is proper to metaphor HAN Yu＇s essays as tide for they developed forcefully and changed like the breaker of Chang widely and changed like broad and Jiang River in the autumn and to metaphor SU Shi＇s essays as sea for they covered extensive sea. What＇s the content of HAN Tide SU Sea？ It＇s the crux.
出处
《河南教育学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2006年第4期36-41,共6页
Journal of Henan Institute of Education(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
广东省普通高校人文社会科学研究项目(04GH75004)
关键词
韩潮
苏海
韩学
苏学
HAN Tide
SU Sea
Hanology
Suology
