摘要
儒家资本主义学说主张“儒家伦理促进经济发展”,曾在学界一度流行。由于儒家资本主义学说要讨论的东亚“现代性的采借”,不同于韦伯要讨论的西欧“现代性的始发”,加之儒家和新教宗教形态、社会作用模式都有不同,“韦伯命题”对儒家资本主义学说的意义有限。儒家资本主义学说过多地依赖韦伯理论,采用单调的对勘比较法建构逻辑,就不免产生过多牵强附会的比附。儒家资本主义学说之所以流行,主要是它迎合了学术思想界一些价值需求,使得这一学说论调多于论证,最终变成一股泡沫化的“思潮”。
Post-Confucian thesis considers the Confucian ethics promoting the economic development. With rethought of the once popular thesis, the article points out Weber-thesis has little significance with post-Confucian thesis because of the distinction of ＂Modernity taking＂ and ＂Modernity transplantation＂, as well as the difference of religious form, social operating mode between Confucian and post-Confucian. Post-Confucian thesis depends more on Weber-thesis which overloads comparison by using monotonous comparing logic. The overloaded comparison is clearly expressed in the demonstration of ＂Confucian sparing theory promoting economic development＂. The popularity of post-Confucian thesis panders the value desire in academic circle, which makes more treatise than proof and finally changes into foam-like ethos.
出处
《史学月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第8期94-100,共7页
Journal of Historical Science
关键词
儒家资本主义
儒家伦理
韦伯命题
Post-Confucian thesis
Confucian ethics
Weber-thesis
