期刊文献+

挖掘客户潜在需求确定指标重要程度的证据组合方法 被引量:2

An Approach for Customer Requirement Mining and Attribute Weight Estimating Based on Evidence Combination
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在现实中,属性(例如产品的各种指标)的权重常常与特定客户的需求有关,因此这些客户的偏好信息对权重的确定非常重要。这种信息不一定就直接体现在对属性的重视程度上,而可能表现在对一组具体产品的偏好关系上。在对产品的指标评价时还会存在一些无知性。针对这些情况,本文给出一个基于证据理论和目标规划、挖掘客户潜在需求的指标权重估计方法,并结合一个计算示例,给出具体的计算过程。 In reality, the weights of attributes (e. g. indices of a product) often depend on the requirement of the customer. Hency the customer preference information is important for weight identifyiing. Such information may be not direct expressed as importance attached to attributes, but implied in their preference on a set of given alternatives. Along with the attribute evaluation, there also maybe exists uncertainty of ignorance. For this kind of circumstance, an attribute weight estimating method based on mining the latent customer requirement is proposed. The theory of evidence combination and goal programming is employed in the procedure. An illustration example is given.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 2006年第3期51-55,共5页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
关键词 权值估计 证据组合 目标规划 weight estimation evidence combination goal programming
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Barzilai J.Deriving weight frojm pairwise comparison matrices[J].Journal of the Operational Research Society,1997,48:1226-1232. 被引量:1
  • 2Deng H,Yeh CH And Willis R.Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights[J].Computers & Operations Research,2000,27:963-973. 被引量:1
  • 3Deng M,Xu W and Yang J-B.Estimating the attribute weights through evidential reasoning and programming[J].International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making,2000,(3):3:419-428. 被引量:1
  • 4Diakoulaki D,Mavrotas G and Papayannakis L.Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems:the CRITIC method[J].Computers & Operations Research,1995,22:963-790. 被引量:1
  • 5Kahraman C.,Cebeci U.and Ruan D.Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP:the case of Turkey[J].International Journal of Production Economics,2004,87:171-184. 被引量:1
  • 6Keeney R anmd Raiffa H.Decision with Multiple Objective,Preferences and Value Trade Offs[M].Wiley,New Yrok,1976. 被引量:1
  • 7Mihailov L.Fuzzy analytical approach to partnership selection information of virtual enterprises[J].Omega,2002,30:393-401. 被引量:1
  • 8Shirland L.E.,Jesse R.R.,Thompson R.L.et al.Determining attribute weights using mathematical programming[J].Omega,2003,31:423-437. 被引量:1
  • 9Yager R R.On the determination of strength of belief for decision support under uncertainty-part Ⅰ:generating strengths of belief[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2004,142:117-128. 被引量:1
  • 10Yang JB.Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainities[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2001,131:31-61. 被引量:1

同被引文献47

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部