期刊文献+

标准外伤大骨瓣与常规骨瓣开颅术治疗重型颅脑损伤的疗效对比分析 被引量:6

Comparative analysis of standard large trauma craniotomy and routine craniotomy for severe craniocerebral injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较标准外伤大骨瓣与常规骨瓣开颅术治疗重型颅脑损伤病人的效果。方法将我科2000年1 月-2006年1月手术的89例额颞顶重型颅脑损伤[Glasgow昏迷评分(GCS)3-8分]病人,分成两组,2000年1月- 2004年7月根据出血部位采用常规额颞或颞顶骨瓣开颅手术35例为常规骨瓣组,2004年8月-2006年1月采用标准外伤大骨瓣开颅手术54例为标准外伤大骨瓣组。所有病人均经CT证实颅内损伤情况。根据Glasgow预后评分(GOS) 评价病人预后。结果术后平均随访6个月,常规骨瓣组恢复良好13例,中残4例,重残2例,植物状态2例,死亡14 例。标准外伤大骨瓣组恢复良好22例,中残14例,重残4例,植物状态3例,死亡11例。排除了术前GCS评分、性别构成及发病至手术时间的影响,标准外伤大骨瓣治疗重型损伤疗效好于常规骨瓣开颅术,病死率明显降低(P<0.05)。结论标准外伤大骨瓣治疗重型颅脑损伤较常规骨瓣开颅术能明显降低重度颅脑损伤的病死率。 Objective To compare the effect of standard large trauma craniotomy versus routine craniotomy on patients with severe craniocerebral injury. Methods Eighty - nine patients with fronto - temporo - parietal severe craniocerebral injury(GCS≤8) in our department from January 2000 to January 2006 were divided into two groups. Thirty - five patients from January 2000 to July 2004 underwent temporo - parietal or fronto - parietal craniotomy according to the position of hematomas as a routine ( RC ) group. Fifty - four patients from Augest 2004 to January 2006 unzerwent standard large trauma craniotomy( SLTC ) as a SL TC group. All patients got their CT scan. The prognosis of the patients was evaluated according to Glasgow outcome scale ( COS ). Results With an average of 6 months follow - up, 13 patients got good outcome, 4 patients got moderate disability,2 patient.s got severe disability ,2 patients got vegetative survival and 14 died in RC group. Twenty-tzuo patients got good outcome, 14 patients got moderate disability, 4 patients got severe disability,3 patients got vegetative survival and 11 died in SL TC group. After excluding the influence of sex.GCS before operation and the time from suffering from disease to operating, the effect of SL TC on severe craniocerebral injury was better than RC, the fatality rate of SLTC uxs lower significantly than RC ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion SLTC reducing the fatality rate of patients with severe craniocerebral injury is more apparent than RC.
出处 《河南外科学杂志》 2006年第4期3-4,共2页 Henan Journal of Surgery
关键词 重型颅脑损伤 标准外伤大骨瓣 常规骨瓣 Severe craniocerebral injury Standard large trauma cranlotomy Routine craniotomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献21

  • 1易声禹,吴声伶,章翔,李安民,吕永禄,袁顺书,孙云岗,蒋先明.救治1,336例重型颅脑损伤的经验[J].创伤杂志,1989,5(1):1-3. 被引量:53
  • 2张赛,天津医药,1995年,23卷,707页 被引量:1
  • 3林孝文,中华神经精神杂志,1982年,2期,92页 被引量:1
  • 4江基尧.介绍一种国外临床常用的标准外伤大骨瓣开颅术.中华神经外科杂志,1998,14(7):381-381. 被引量:57
  • 5Gerhart KA, Mellick DC, Weintraub AH. Violence-related traumatic brain injury: a population-based study. J R Soc Med, 2003,96:617. 被引量:1
  • 6Carli P, Orliaguet G. Severe traumatic brain injury in children.Lancet, 2004, 363(9409):584-585. 被引量:1
  • 7Bache J. Reducing the toll of road traffic accidents. Eur J Epidemiol, 2003, 18:1059-1063. 被引量:1
  • 8Chaudhry MA, Santarius. Head injuries: a prospective observational study evaluating the potential impact of the Galasko report on Accident and Emergency departments. Injury, 2003, 34:853-856. 被引量:1
  • 9American Medical Association Report. Automobil-related injuries:components,trend. prevention. JAMA, 1983, 294:3216. 被引量:1
  • 10Hamilton SM. Coalition of trauma-trauma prevention and trauma care: presidential address , trauma association of Canada. J Trauma,1991, 31:951. 被引量:1

共引文献744

同被引文献31

引证文献6

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部