摘要
公司设立过程中,股东或设立人可能因各种原因对公司法规定的设立事项或程序进行规避或违反,对此,英美法系国家一般采取瑕疵设立原则承认主义,而大陆法系国家法律一般规定的有设立无效或撤销设立登记制度。我国应借鉴两大法系的优点,结合我国实际,确立以公司设立形式判断为主要原则、以公司设立无效为补充的制度体系,并就设立无效公司的认定程序、公司行为的效力等问题加以规定,从而解决目前司法实践中的问题和困惑。
Shareholders or promoters are most likely to infringe against the incorporating issues and procedures in process of setting up a company for various reasons. This flawed incorporation is treated as acquisition in accordance with flawed incorporation principles in Anglo-American law system, while as invalid in accordance with invalid or abolished registration principle in continental system. Therefore we shall set up a core principle in terms of incorporating format, accomplished by system of invalid incorporation, provide a corresponding ascertaining-procedures on invalid incorporation, effectiveness of company＇s act, consulting the advantages of both law systems, combining our realities and experiences in incorporation, in order to settle current problems and bewilderment.
出处
《河南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
北大核心
2006年第3期74-77,共4页
Journal of Henan Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词
公司设立
瑕疵
无效
company＇s incorporation
flaw
invalid
