摘要
诉讼法一般是从证明对象的角度看既判力事实是否对涉及该事实的后诉事实的预决效力,而笔者则从司法认知的角度来认识既判力事实的预决效力,既判力事实是否具有预先确定的绝对效力,法官在后案中无须当事人举证证明,作为司法认知的事项直接进行确认,是一个非常复杂的问题。笔者认为断然肯定或是否定既判力事实作为司法认知的对象,都是错误的。既判力事实对司法认知的效力具有相对性,有的既判力事实是司法认知的对象,有的既判力事实则不能成为司法认知的对象。
in procedure law, the fact of adjudged force is studied from the angel that whether it has the effect of pre - judging upon the issue of facts in other eases. However, in this essay, this author holds that it should be studied from the angle of judicial notice. Whether the fact of adjudged force has the effect pf pre - judging and whether the judge presiding in other cases may directly take notice of the fact is a very complex question. This author hold the view that it is not right to affirm or deny that the fact of adjudged force is the object of judicial notice. The natural and true conclusion is that whether the fact of adjudged force is the object of judicial notice can only be seen in light of the respective standard of proof in criminal, civil and administrative procedure.
出处
《云南大学学报（法学版）》
2006年第3期58-61,共4页
Jorunal of Yunan University Law Edition
关键词
既判力事实
司法认知
预决力
绝对
相对
the fact of adjudged force
judicial notice
the effect of pre - judging, absolutely
relatively
