摘要
使用传统法律选择方法解决国际商事仲裁协议效力的法律冲突,在识别和确定连接点方面都存在缺陷和困难。在法国等国家兴起的国际商事仲裁协议独立于国内法的理论主张采用实体规范确定仲裁协议的效力,在一定程度上克服了法律选择方法的缺陷,有助于更加迅速、公正地处理案件,反映了国际商事仲裁立法和实践的新趋势。
It is both defective and difficult to settle conflicts of laws by identifying and ascertaining joint factors via traditional choice of law. A doctrine put forth in France and other countries advocates the independency of arbitration arrangements of municipal law and urges that substantial legal rules should be adopted to determine the effect of arbitration agreements. This doctrine still has much room for improvement, but it represents a new trend in the legislative and practical areas of international commercial arbitration and can, to some extent, cure the defects resulting from choice of law and is conducive to rapid and fair solution of cases.
出处
《西南政法大学学报》
2006年第2期52-59,共8页
Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
国际商事仲裁协议
实体规范
国内法
独立性
评价
international commercial arbitration agreements
substantive rules
autonomy
national laws
comnlents
