期刊文献+

检测粪便c-ki-ras2基因点突变筛查大肠癌 被引量:3

Detection of C-Ki-Ras2 Point Mutation in Stools for Colorectal Cancer Screening
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究大肠癌患者粪便c-ki-ras2基因外显子1第12位密码子点突变情况,探讨检测粪便c-ki- ras2基因点突变对筛查大肠癌的价值。方法:提取2005年于广州市第一人民医院就诊的25例大肠癌患者粪便、肿瘤组织和癌旁组织黏膜的DNA,结合限制性内切酶Mva I,用普通聚合酶链反应-限制性片段长度多态性 (PCR-RFLP)及突变富集型聚合酶链反应-限制性片段长度多态性(mutant-enriched PCR-RFLP),分析c-ki-ras2 基因外显子1的12位密码子第一、二位碱基是否存在点突变;用同样方法分析正常对照组17例。特异性分析采用经克隆测序已知突变型(12GGT→AGT)及野生型(12GGT)的c-ki-ras2外显子1片段。取同期住院的166 例胃肠道疾病患者大便潜血试验(FOBT)检查结果作对照。结果:25例大肠癌患者粪便中,突变富集型PCR- RFLP检出7例k-ras基因点突变(28%),其中6例在相应组织中也检出突变,粪便与组织DNA检测结果高度一致(Kappa=0.896,P<0.01)。正常人粪便未检出突变,两组相比差异有显著性(P<0.05)。癌旁黏膜均未发现突变。普通PCR-RFLP只检出其中3例(12%)。c-ki-ras2点突变更多见于左半结肠癌,与结肠其他部位相比差异有显著性(P<0.05)。肠癌患者与其它胃肠道疾病者FOBT阳性率无差异,分别为58%、46%(P> 0.05)。结论:粪便c-ki-ras2基因点突变检测特异性达100%,比FOBT(50.6%)高,但单个基因的检测敏感性较FOBT低(28% vs 51.2%,P<0.05),粪检基因诊断大肠癌有一定应用前景;突变富集型PCR-RFLP较普通 PCR-RFLP有更高的检出率。 Objective:To investigate the value of stool c-ki-ras2 mutation detection in colorectal cancer screening. Methods: DNA was extracted from stools and tissue samples of 25 colorectal cancer patients and 17 healthy controls. The exon 1 fragments containing eodon 12 were analyzed by one-stcp PCR-RFLP and mutant-enriched PCR-RFLP using Mva Ⅰ. Specificity of the method was determined using the previously known mutant (12GGT→AGT) and wild type samples of c-ki-ras2 exon 1 fragments. Fecal occult blood test (FOBT) was done in 166 patients with gastrointestinal diseases. The results were compared with stool DNA testing. Results: c-ki-ras2 gene was successfully amplified from stool samples. Mutation in the first and second bases of codon 12 was 28% (7/28) by mutant-enriched PCR-RFLP. This result was highly consistent with that of tumor tissue samples with 6 having mutations ( Kappa = 0. 896, P 〈 0.01 ) , Only 3 ( 12% ) of them were found by one-step PCR-RFLP. There was no mutation found in healthy controls. The positive rate of FOBT was not different between colorectal cancers and other gastrointestinal diseases. Conclusions: c-ki-ras2 mutation detcetion in stool samples was more specific than that of FOBT. However, single gene detection had lower sensitivity than FOBT. Stool-basod DNA detection provided a non-invasive screening method for colorectal cancer. Mutant-enriched PCR-RFLP was more sensitive than one-step PCR-RFLP for c-ki-ras2 point mutation analysis.
出处 《广州医学院学报》 2005年第6期40-44,共5页 Academic Journal of Guangzhou Medical College
关键词 大肠癌 c-ki-ras2基因 粪便DNA PCR/RFLP colorectal cancer c-ki-ras2 stool DNA PCR/RFLP
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Parkin D.M,Pisani P,Ferlay J.Global cancer statistics[J].CA Cancer J Clin,1999,49(1):33 -64. 被引量:1
  • 2干月波,蔡心涵,郑树.结直肠癌病人粪便及组织中Ki-ras基因突变的研究[J].浙江医科大学学报,1995,24(6):241-247. 被引量:16
  • 3Grath JP,Capon DJ,Smith DH,et al.Structure and organization of the human Ki-ras proto-oncogene and a related processed pseudogene[J].Nature,1983,304(11):501-506. 被引量:1
  • 4Kinzler KW,Vogelstein B.Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer[J].Cell,1996,87 (2):159-70. 被引量:1
  • 5Chen CY,Shiesh SC,Wu SJ.Rapid detection of K-ras mutations in bile by peptide nucleic acid-mediated PCR clamping and melting curve analysis:comparison with restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis[J].Clin Chem,2004,50 (3):481-489. 被引量:1
  • 6Dieterle CP,Conzelman M,Linnemann U.Detection of isolated tumor cells by Polymerase Chain ReactionRestriction Fragment Length Polymorphism for k-ras mutations in tissue samples of 199 colorectal cancer patients[J].Clin Cancer Res,2004,10 (2):641-650. 被引量:1
  • 7Wu CM,Tang R,Wang JY,et al.Frequency and spectrum of K-RAS codons 12 and 13 mutations in colorectal adenocarcinomas from Taiwan[J].Cancer Genet Cyto,2005,158(1):55 -60. 被引量:1
  • 8Ahlquist DA,Skoletsky JE,Boynton KA,et al.Colorectal cancer screening by detection of altered human DNA in stool:feasibility of a multit arget assay panel[J].Gastroenterology,2000,119 (5):1219-1227. 被引量:1
  • 9Deenadayalu VP,Rex DK.Fecal-based DNA assays:a new,noninvasive approach to colorectal cancer screening[J].Cleve Clin J Med,2004,71(6):497 -503. 被引量:1
  • 10李瑜元.第十三届世界消化疾病会议纪要[J].中华消化杂志,2005,25(12):754-756. 被引量:3

共引文献17

同被引文献41

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部