期刊文献+

非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征当日经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的效果 被引量:2

Safety and in-hospital clinical outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention within 24 hours after admission in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者在住院当日行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的安全性和住院临床结果。方法 SUNDAY(Strategies for UA/NSTEMI and Delay of AngioplastY)为单中心回顾性注册研究,入选2000年1月至2002年12月3年间首次因非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征在本院住院的1013例患者,记录患者的临床特点、治疗经过以及住院心血管事件等情况。本研究选择SUNDAY注册中冠状动脉造影后接受PCI的患者,比较当日(≤24 h)PCI和入院24 h以后行PCI的安全性和住院临床结果。结果在SUNDAY注册的1013例患者中,共有438例患者入院后接受冠状动脉造影和PCI。35例和 403例分别于入院≤24 h(当日PCI组)和24 h以后(非当日PCI组)行PCI。两组基础临床特征基本相似。当日PCI组和非当日PCI组分别在入院后(22±7)h和(142±152)h行冠状动脉造影(P<0.01),两组分别于入院后(1.0±0.0)d和(7.5±7.3)d行PCI(P<0.01),PCI成功率分别为97.1%与97.0%(P> 0.05)。完全血管重建率分别为62.9%与53.6%(P>0.05)。两组住院期间均无死亡,住院新发心肌梗死发生率分别为2.9%与1.2%(P:0.395),再次血管重建率分别为0与0.2%(P>0.05),主要不良心脏事件 (包括死亡、新发心肌梗死、再次血管重建)发生率分别为2.9%与1.5%(P>0.05)。当日PCI组的住院时间分别为(7.7±3.0)d与(15.2±9.8)d(P<0.01),住院费用分别为(6.1±2.3)万元与(6.4±3.1)万元(P=0.582)。结论非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征患者在住院当日接受冠状动脉造影并行PCI安全可行, 其成功率较高,临床事件发生率较低,能显著缩短住院日,并有降低住院费用的趋势。 Objective To investigate the safety and in-hospital clinical outcome of pereutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 24 hours after admission, called same-day PCI, in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Methods SUNDAY (Strategies for UA/NSTEMI and Delay of AngioplastY) single-center registry, was used. Clinical features, treatment and in-hospital outcome of 1013 hospitalized patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome from January 2000 to December 2002 were recorded. Patients who received PCI after coronary angiography (CAG) were selected to compare the safety and clinical outcome of same-day PCI ( ≤24 hours) and not-same-day ( 〉 24 hours) PCI. Results Among 1013 patients enrolled in the SUNDAY registry, 438 (male 74.8%, unstable angina 94.1% ) received PCI after CAG, 35 patients received PCI within 24 hours [ ( 1.0 ± 0.0) day, group Ⅰ and 403 after 24 hours [ (7.5 ± 7.3) days, group Ⅱ of hospitalization (P 〈 0.0001). Baseline angiographie and clinical characteristics of the two groups were comparable. Procedural success rates and complete revascularization rates were also similar. During hospitalization, no patients died after PCI with new-onset rates of myocardial infarction (2.9% vs 1.2%, P= 0.395), rovascularization (0 vs 0.2%, P = 1.000) and major adverse cardiac events (death, new-onset myocardial infarction or revascularization) (2.9% vs 1.5%, P = 0.444) in group Ⅰ and group Ⅱ . Patients in group Ⅰ PCI had a shorter hospital stay and less hospital cost than in group Ⅱ [ (7.7 ± 3.0) vs (15.2 ± 9.8) days, P 〈 0.0001] [ (61000±23000) vs (64000±31000) RMB, P=0.582]. Conclusion Same-day PCI for patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome was safe and feasible, with high procedural success rate, low adverse event rate, shorter hospital stay and less hospital cost.
出处 《中华急诊医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2006年第5期426-428,共3页 Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
基金 国家重点基础研究发展规划(973计划)资助项目(2003CB517103)
关键词 冠状动脉疾病 冠状动脉造影 主要不良心脏事件 早期侵入策略 Coronary artery disease Coronary angiography Major adverse cardiac events Early invasive strategies
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1FRISC Ⅱ Investigators. Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC Ⅱ prospective randomized multicentre study [J]. Lancet, 1999, 354 (6): 708-715. 被引量:1
  • 2Allenton L, Lagerqvist B, Husted S, et al. Outcome at 1 year after an invasive compared with a non-invasive strategy in unstable coronary-artery disease: the FRISC Ⅱ invasive randomized trial. FRISC Ⅱ Investigators. Fast Revascularization during Instability in Coronary artery disease [J]. Lancet, 2000, 356 (1): 9-16. 被引量:1
  • 3Cannon CP, Weintraub WS, Demopoulos LA, et al. Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa inhibitor tirofiban [J]. N Engl J Meal, 2001, 344 (25) : 1879-1887. 被引量:1
  • 4Fox KA, Poole-Wilson PA, Henderson RA, et al. Interventionsl versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomized trial [J]. Lancet, 2002, 360 (9335): 743-751. 被引量:1
  • 5聂绍平,马长生,吕强,张崟,杜昕,康俊平,郝鹏,刘彤,王苏,董建增,刘晓惠,吴学思.中高危非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征早期侵入与早期保守策略的评价[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(4):307-311. 被引量:5
  • 6刘文娴,吕树铮,陈立颖,卢燕玲.高龄急性冠脉综合征患者血运重建问题初探[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2004,13(8):545-547. 被引量:9
  • 7Gruberg L. ICTUS: invasive versus conservative treatment in unstable coronary syndromes. European society of cardiology Congress, 2004.http: //www. medscape.com/viewarticle/488821. 被引量:1
  • 8Neumann FJ, Kastrati A, Pogatsa-Murray G, et al. Evaluation of prolonged antithrombotic pretreatment ( "Cooling-Off" Strategy) before intervention in patients with unstable coronary syndromes. A randomized controlled trial [J]. JAMA, 2003, 290 (12): 1593-1599. 被引量:1
  • 9SilberS, Albertsson P, Aviles FF, et al. The task force for percutaneous coronary interventions of the european society of cardiology[J]. Eur Heart J, 2005, 26 (6): 804-847. 被引量:1

二级参考文献17

  • 1Holmvang L, Clemmensen P, Lindahl B.Quantitative analysis of the admission electrocardiogram identifies patients with unstable coronary artery disease who benefit the most from early invasive treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol,2003,41:905-915. 被引量:1
  • 2Tresch DD, Alla HR. Diagnosis and management of myocardial ischemia (angina) in the elderly patient. Am J Geriatr Cardiol,2001,10:337-344. 被引量:1
  • 3Blackman DJ, Ferguson JD, Sprigings DC. et al.Revascularization for acute coronary syndromes in older people. Age Ageing,2003,32:129-135. 被引量:1
  • 4Himbert D. Unstable angina in the elderly, Ann Cardiol Angeiol(Paris),2001,50 :397-403. 被引量:1
  • 5Thompson RC, Holms DR,Gersh B, et al. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in elderly.J Am Coll Cardiol,1991,17:1245-1250. 被引量:1
  • 6FRISC Ⅱ Investigators. Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC Ⅱ prospective randomised multicentre study. Lancet, 1999, 354: 708-715. 被引量:1
  • 7Wallentin L, Lagerqvist B, Husted S, et al. Outcome at 1 year after an invasive compared with a non-invasive strategy in unstable coronary-artery disease: the FRISC Ⅱ invasive randomised trial. FRISC Ⅱ Investigators. Fast revascularisation during instability in coronary artery disease. Lancet, 2000, 356:9-16. 被引量:1
  • 8Cannon CP, Weintraub WS, Demopoulos LA, et al. Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa inhibitor tirofiban. N Engl J Med, 2001, 344:1879-1887. 被引量:1
  • 9Fox KAA, Poole-Wilson PA, Henderson RA, et al. Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial. Lancet, 2002, 360: 743-751. 被引量:1
  • 10Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina). Circulation, 2002,106:1893-1900. 被引量:1

共引文献12

同被引文献20

  • 1张鹏,王前,郑磊,曾方银,裘宇容.心肌型脂肪酸结合蛋白早期诊断急性冠脉综合征[J].南方医科大学学报,2006,26(3):358-360. 被引量:11
  • 2李十红,李志忠,朱小玲,高海,李楠,艾辉,杜如跃.小剂量rt-PA快速给药30min与60min治疗急性心肌梗死疗效观察[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2006,15(4):345-347. 被引量:4
  • 3雷娟,周淑娴,张玉玲,王景峰,聂如琼,罗年桑,谭桂明.非ST段抬高急性心肌梗死的临床特点及治疗现状[J].岭南心血管病杂志,2007,13(1):25-28. 被引量:15
  • 4Menon V, Harrington RA, Hoehman JS, et 81. Thrombolysis and adjunctive therapy in acute myocardial infarction: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy [ J ]. Chest,2004, 126 (3 Suppl) : 549-575. 被引量:1
  • 5The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee. Myocardial infarction redefined-A consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction E J]. Eur Heart J, 2000, 21 (18): 1502-1513. 被引量:1
  • 6Glatz JF, Storch J. Unravelling the significance of cellular fatty acidbinding proteins [J]. Curr Opin Lipidol, 2001, 12 (2) : 267-274. 被引量:1
  • 7Chan CPY, Sanderson JE, Glanz JFC, et 81. A super early myocardial infarction marker-Human heart type fatty acid binding protein[J]. Z Kardiol, 2004, 93 (2): 388-397. 被引量:1
  • 8Sacchettini JC, Gordon JI. Rat intestinal fatty acid-binding protein, a model system for analyzing the forces that can bind fatty acids to proteins[J]. J Biol Cbem, 1993, 268 (25) : 18399-18402. 被引量:1
  • 9Knowhon AA, Burrier RE, Brecher P. Rabbit heart fatty acid-binding protein. Isolation, characterization, and application of a monoclonal antibody [J]. Circ Res, 1989, 65 (4):981-988. 被引量:1
  • 10Glatz JF, Kleine AH, van Nieuwenhoven FA, et 81. Fatty-acidbinding protein as a plasma marker for the estimation of myocardial infarct size in humans [J]. BrHeartJ, 1994, 71 (2): 135-140. 被引量:1

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部