摘要
目的:探讨锁骨骨折的治疗方法。方法:1998年3月～2005年6月113例Ⅰ类锁骨骨折病人分別采用非手术治疗、切开复位骨圓针内固定、记忆合金环形抱骨板和AO重建钛钢板4种方法治疗。术后随访3用～24个月。結果:临床疗效按连学全等拟定的标准进行评价。手术治疗共54例,50例优良,优良率92．6％。非手术治疗59例,51例优良,优良率 86.4％。手术与非手术治疗优良率无明显差异。結论:锁骨骨折的手术治疗与非手术治疗临床疗效相同。3种手术治疗方法中。AO重建钢板可根据锁骨形态塑形,内固定牢靠,并发症相对较少,是1种比较理想的手术治疗方法。
Objective：To probe the way of the treatment of clavicular fracture. Methods： From March 1998 to June of 2005 , a total of 113 patients, who was 18-50 years old and had the fracture of clavicle, was treated with surgery or non-surgery treatment. They were all followed up for 3 weeks to 24 months after treatment. Results： Among the 54 patients of operative treatment, 50 were excellent and satisfactory , and 51 of 59 non-operation treatment patients were the excellent and satisfactory according to the Lian Xuequan＇s standards. There were no difference between the two ways of treatment. Conclusion： The surgery treatment of clavicular fracture had the same good effect as the non-operation treatment. Among the three kinds of operation methods, purity titanium plate internal fixation was the most favorable.
出处
《中国临床医学》
北大核心
2006年第2期282-283,共2页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Medicine
关键词
锁骨骨折
治疗
Clavicular fracture
Treatment
