期刊文献+

Quantified Risk Assessment for Plants Producing and Storing Explosives 被引量:2

Quantified Risk Assessment for Plants Producing and Storing Explosives
下载PDF
导出
摘要 This paper presents a methodology for risk assessment of plants producing and storing explosives. The major procedural steps for quantified risk assessment (QRA) in explosive plants are the following: hazard identification, accident sequence modeling, data acquisition, accident sequence quantification, consequence assessment and integration of results. This methodology is demonstrated and applied in an explosive plant consisting of four separate units, which produce detonating cord, nitroglycol, dynamites and ammonium nitrate fuel oil (ANFO). A GIS platform is used for depicting individual risk from explosions in this plant. Total individual risk is equal to 1.0 × 10^-4/y in a distance of 340m from the center of the plant, and 1.0 × 10^-6/y in a distance of 390m from the center of the plant. This paper presents a methodology for risk assessment of plants producing and storing explosives. The major procedural steps for quantified risk assessment (QRA) in explosive plants are the following: hazard identification, accident sequence modeling, data acquisition, accident sequence quantification, consequence assessment and integration of results. This methodology is demonstrated and applied in an explosive plant consisting of four separate units, which produce detonating cord, nitroglycol, dynamites and ammonium nitrate fuel oil (ANFO). A GIS platform is used for depicting individual risk from explosions in this plant. Total individual risk is equal to 1.0 × 10^-4/y in a distance of 340m from the center of the plant, and 1.0 × 10^-6/y in a distance of 390m from the center of the plant.
出处 《International Journal of Automation and computing》 EI 2006年第2期184-191,共8页 国际自动化与计算杂志(英文版)
关键词 Risk assessment explosives master logic diagram hazard identification QRA. Risk assessment, explosives, master logic diagram, hazard identification, QRA.
  • 相关文献

同被引文献18

  • 1李保良,赵东风.基于PHAST的甲醇储罐定量风险分析[J].安防科技,2011(1):6-9. 被引量:11
  • 2吴笑,龙长江.安全评价中的气体扩散模型及应用[J].工业安全与环保,2005,31(8):50-51. 被引量:15
  • 3陈宝智.安全原理[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,1989. 被引量:4
  • 4V Cozzani, G Gubinelli, E Salzano. Escalation thresholds in the assessment of domino accidental events [ J]. Jonrnal of Hazardous Materials, 2006, 129(1-3): 1-21. 被引量:1
  • 5V Cozzani, G Gubinelli, G Antonioni, et al. The assessment of risk caused by domino effect in quantitative area risk analysis[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2005, 127(1 - 3) : 14 - 30. 被引量:1
  • 6CPR18E (1999). Guidelines for quantitative risk assessment (" Purple book"). Den Haag: Committee for the Prevention of Disasters. 被引量:1
  • 7V Cozzani, E Salzano. Threshold values for domino effects caused by blast wave interaction with process equipment[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2004, 17(6): 437-447. 被引量:1
  • 8T Abbasi, S A Abbasi. The boiling liquid expanding vaponr explosion ( BLEVE ) : Mechanism, consequence assessment, management [ J ]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007, 141(3): 489-519. 被引量:1
  • 9GB 18218-2000.重大危险源辨识[S]. 被引量:22
  • 10徐志胜,吴振营,何佳.池火灾模型在安全评价中应用的研究[J].灾害学,2007,22(4):25-28. 被引量:21

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部