摘要
目的:比较输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术(PL)与体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效。方法:对经PL(PL组)和ESWL(ESWL组)治疗的输尿管下段结石患者的临床资料进行比较。结果:PL组单次碎石成功率为96.3%,ESWL组为62.7%(P<0.01);PL组术后4W结石排净率为98.4%,ESWL组为68.2%。两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效明显优于ESWL。
Objective： To contrast the therapeutic effect and safety of ureteroscopy Pneumatic lithotripsy （PL） and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy （Eswl） in the treatment of distal ureteral calculi. Methods： To investigated the clinical material of the treatment of distal ureteral calculi, 191 Patients with PL, 201 Patients with ESWL. Results： in PL group 96.3% Patients were successful on the first lithotripsy, 62.7% in ESWL group （P〈0.01）; following PL 98.4% Patients became stone free in 4 weeks, after ESWL the stone free rate was 68.2% （ P〈0.01 ） ; Conclusions： For the treatment of distal ureteral calculi, ureteroscopy pneumatic lithotripsy has a higher stone free rate than ESWL.
出处
《大理学院学报（综合版）》
CAS
2006年第2期43-44,46,共3页
Journal of Dali University
关键词
输尿管结石
输尿管镜
碎石术
ureteral calculi
ureteroscopy
lithotripsy
