摘要
本文对段忠桥教授的《对“五种社会形态理论”一个主要依据的质疑》一文的主要观点提出了不同看法,指出:段文把“草稿”作为“序言”的基础,实际上是混淆了“草稿”与正式出版的《政治经济学批判。第一分册》一书,而其对“草稿”的有关论述的理解也很值得商榷,段文在此基础上对“五种社会形态理论”的否定是不能成立的。
This paper holds a different idea from the one expressed in Questioning the Major Evidence of ＂Five Types of Social, Formations＂ by Professor Duan Zhongqiao. The author points out that Duan＇s paper regarded Grundrisse as the basis of ＂The Preface＂. This showed that Duan actually failed to make a distinction between Grundrisse and the officially published A Contribution to the Critique Political Economy （Book Ⅰ）. Moreover, Duan＇s interpretation of some arguments in Grundrisse is also questionable. Therefore, Duan＇s refutation of ＂five types of social formations＂ is not well justified.
出处
《教学与研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第2期26-32,共7页
Teaching and Research
