期刊文献+

垂体肿瘤患者经蝶手术后心理状态与生活质量的评估 被引量:5

Postoperative mental status and quality of life in patients with pituitary adenomas after transsphenoidal resection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析垂体腺瘤患者术后的生活质量,探讨影响其预后的因素。方法:于2002-01/2003-04选择华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院神经外科行经蝶手术的垂体瘤患者100例进行Karnofsky评分量表结合自评问卷调查。①采用Karnofsky表现评分量表评定脑肿瘤患者生活质量,主要测定患者的执行能力和进行正常活动的能力,最高为100分,最低为0分。于治疗前和治疗后1年分别评定1次。②采用自制的生活质量综合评定问卷进行生活质量自我评定,内容包括患者一般情况、疾病的症状、躯体健康、对疾病的了解程度及信心、与家人及周围人的关系、胜任劳动及家务情况、从事社会活动情况等方面。由患者根据自己的实际情况独立完成,于手术后1年进行评定。数据处理方法包括单因素多变量方差分析、多因素线性回归分析和t检验。结果:随访时间1年,随访率100%。①89例患者术后的Karnofsky评分量表评分均较术前有不同程度的升高。②影响患者术后生活质量的因素有:术前视力视野、头痛头晕呕吐、女性月经、肿瘤大小及切除程度、肿瘤复发与否、泌乳素/生长激素是否正常及性别、年龄、文化程度、职业。结论:经蝶手术作为功能保护性手术方式可以明显提高患者的生活质量,影响患者术后生活质量的根本性因素是术前状况。Karnofsky表现评分量表评分在一定程度上可以反映患者的生活质量。 AIM: To analyze the postoperative quality of life (QOL) in patients with pituitary adenomas, and investigate the factors that affect the prognosis. METHODS: Totally 1130 patients with pituitary adenomas, who were treated with transsphenoidal resection in the Department of Neurosurgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology between January 2002 and April 2003, were investigated with Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) and self-rating questionnaire. ① The KPS was used to assess the QOL of patients with brain tumor mainly including the abilities of performance and normal activity, the highest and lowest scores were 100 and 0 respectively, they were assessed before treatment and at 1 year after treatment respectively.② The self-designed QOL comprehensive rating questionnaire was applied in the QOL self- evaluation, the contents included the general information, symptoms of disease, physical health, understanding and confidence to the disease, correlation with family members and people around, involvement in labor and housework, participation in social activities, etc. The questionnaires were finished by the patients according to their own actual conditions at 1 year postoperatively, The data were treated with univariate and multivariate analysis of variance, multiple linear regression analysis and t RESULTS: The patients were followed up for 1 year, and the follow-up rate was 100%. ① The postoperative KPS scores in the 89 patients were all increased to different degree as compared with the preoperative ones. ② The factors that affected the postoperative QOL of the patients were the sight before operation, headache, dizziness and vomiting, menorrhea in females, the size of the tumor, the extent of the resection, whether with recurrence or not, level of prolactin or growth hormone, gender, age, level of education and occupation. CONCLUSION: As a functional protective operation, transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas can improve the QOL of t
出处 《中国临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第2期15-17,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(39670736)~~
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1刘红朝,董芳永,雷霆.脑肿瘤患者生存质量的评估[J].中国临床康复,2002,6(10):1396-1397. 被引量:10
  • 2Tandon PK. Applications of global statistics in analyzing quality of life data.Star Med 1990;9(7): 819-25. 被引量:1
  • 3Buchfelder M. Pituitary adenomas. Onkolge 1999;5(2):94-102. 被引量:1
  • 4Voruganti L, Cortese L, Oyewumi L, et al.Comparative evaluation of conventional and novel antipsychotic drugs with reference to their subjective tolerability, side-effect profile and impact on quality of life.Schizophr Res 2000;43(2-3): 135-45. 被引量:1
  • 5Donovan K, Sanson-Fisher RW, Redman S. Measuring quality of life in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 1989, 7(171): 959-68. 被引量:1
  • 6Tucha O, Smely C, Seeger W,et al. Assessment of quality of life of patients with brain. Zentralbl Neurochir 1998; 59(4): 263-8. 被引量:1
  • 7王忠诚.神经外科学[M].武汉:湖北科学技术出版社,2004.483-486. 被引量:224
  • 8吴毅,胡永善,范文可,杨晓冰,王倩.康复医学功能评定量表信度和效度研究[J].中国临床康复,2002,6(3):310-310. 被引量:46
  • 9Chan RC, Thompson MD. Morbidity, mortality, and quality of life following surgery for intracranial meningiomas. J Neurosurg 1984; 60(1): 52-60. 被引量:1
  • 10徐振球.医学统计学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.397-425. 被引量:1

二级参考文献8

  • 1SEYMOUR DG,BALL AE,RUSSELL EM,et al. Problems in using health survey questionnaires in older patients with physical disabilities.The reliability and validity of the SF-36 and the effect of cognitive impairment[J].J Eval Clin Pract,2001,7(4):411. 被引量:1
  • 2HOBART JC,LAMPING DL,FREEMAN JA,et al. Evidence based measurement:which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation[J].Neurology,2001,57(4):639. 被引量:1
  • 3KUCUKDEVECI AA,YAVUZER G,ELHAN AH,et al. Adaptation of the Functional Independence Measure for use in Turkey[J].Clin Rehabil,2001,15(3):311. 被引量:1
  • 4DAVING Y,ANDREN E,NORDHOLM L,et al. Reliability of an interview approach to the Functional Independence Measure[J].Clin Rehabil,2001,15(3):301. 被引量:1
  • 5COHEN ME,MARINO RJ. The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures[J].Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2000,81(12):21. 被引量:1
  • 6SCHINDL MR,FORSTNER C,KERN H,et al. Evaluation of a German version of the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) in acute and chronic stroke patients[J].Eur J Neurol,2000,7(5):523. 被引量:1
  • 7高谦,王福根.重视康复医学的临床评估问题[J].现代康复,2000,4(2):242-242. 被引量:10
  • 8吴毅,胡永善,范文可,杨晓冰,王倩.康复医学功能评定量表信度和效度研究[J].中国临床康复,2002,6(3):310-310. 被引量:46

共引文献277

同被引文献66

引证文献5

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部