摘要
本文借用柏拉图的“洞穴理论”来解读和评论舍伍德.安德森的《小城畸人》。文章首先讨论了柏拉图在“洞穴理论”中对人类生存状态的分析对于理解和评价《小城畸人》有怎样的帮助,然后论述柏拉图对于真理的探求是如何在《小城畸人》中得以重现的。最后,文章分析了安德森的《小城畸人》在创作目的上与“洞穴理论”存在的差异,并通过这种差异探讨人们在不同的社会历史时期对生活的不同理解。
Many similarities could be found if one compares Sherwood Anderson＇s Winesburg, Ohio with Plato＇s ＂Allegory of the Cave. ＂ These similarities include not only images but symbols and thematic concerns. This essay, therefore, intends firstly to analyse and comment on these similarities, and by doing so find our way in understanding the various ways of small town lives in Anderson＇s novel. Further discussion would be made on how the pursuit of truth in ＂the Allegory of the Cave＂ has been practiced and eventually realized in Winesburg, Ohio. The last part of the essay would be mainly on the discussion of the different writing purposes between Anderson and Plato. It is hoped that, through such a discussion, different understandings of human existence due to different ages are decoded.
出处
《河南大学学报（社会科学版）》
北大核心
2006年第1期117-119,共3页
Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences）
