摘要
危险犯是既遂犯的通说观点存在诸多缺陷,因而不可取。由于在主观方面可以将行为人的故意分为危险故意和实害故意,在客观方面可以将危害结果分为危险结果与实害结果,因此,简单地认为危险犯是相应侵害犯的未遂形态或者说危险犯包括侵害犯的预备、未遂和中止三种形态的看法也不尽合理。对于危险犯的形态问题及其法条适用应当通过具体分析后再确定。
The prevailing saying that a dangerous crime is necessarily an accomplished one is full of defects and thus is unacceptable. Subjectively, the default of an offender can be classified into dangerous design and actual damage design. Objectively, the criminal consequence can be classified into dangerous consequence and actual damage consequence. So, simply considering that a dangerous crime is an unaccomplished form of the attempted crime, or is a preparation, an unaccomplished stage, or suspension of the crime is improper. The form and applicable provisions of a dangerous crime are a complicated problem that can be solved only by specific analyses.
出处
《西南政法大学学报》
2005年第6期101-106,共6页
Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
