期刊文献+

对“明知他人有间谍犯罪行为”的理解 被引量:5

An Analysis of Being Fully Aware that Others Had Espionage Activities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 刑法第311条规定的拒绝提供间谍犯罪证据罪的成立以行为人“明知”他人有间谍犯罪行为为前提条件,行为人对他人有间谍犯罪行为是否“明知”就成了本罪是否成立的关键。文章拟从“明知他人有间谍犯罪行为”的涵义、如何认定、“明知”的形成时间及其与刑法总则“明知”的关系等方面理清相关问题。 The crime of refusing to provide evidences on spionage presupposes being fully aware that others had espionage activities, so whether one was fully aware that others had espionage activities was a decisive move which determined whether he committed the crime. This paper would expound the meaning of being fully aware that others had espionage activities,how to define it,when it came into being,the relations between it and that in general provisions of criminal law, ete, so as to cast a brick to attract jade, and offer a reference to judicial practice.
作者 唐治祥
机构地区 重庆三峡学院
出处 《成都教育学院学报》 2006年第2期112-114,共3页 Journal of Chendu College of Education
关键词 明知 前提 一定 可能 间谍犯罪证据 being fully aware presuppose surely probably evidences on espionage
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1郑健才.刑法总则[M].台湾:台湾三民书局,1982.. 被引量:2
  • 2赵秉志主编..妨害司法罪[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,1999:381.
  • 3赖宇,陆德山..中国刑法之争[M].长春:吉林大学出版社,1989:612.

共引文献1

同被引文献55

引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部