期刊文献+

氯诺昔康静脉自控镇痛与吗啡硬膜外自控镇痛的临床比较 被引量:2

Comparative study of postoperative patient-controlled intravenous anagesia with lornoxicam and patient-contronlled epidural analgesia with morphine in patient undergoing orthopaedics surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较骨科手术后患者氯诺昔康静脉自控镇痛(PICA)与吗啡硬膜外自控镇痛(PCEA)的临床效果和不良反应。方法100例ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ骨科择期手术患者随机分为两组:PICA(n=50)和PCEA组 (n=50)。PICA组于手术结束前约30 min 静注氯诺昔康8 mg和恩丹西琼(恩丹西酮)4mg后连接镇痛泵 (48 mg氯诺昔康+生理盐水至100 ml);PCEA组于手术结束前约30 min硬膜外腔注入吗啡1mg和恩丹西酮4mg加生理盐水至10ml后连接镇痛泵(9 mg吗啡+布比卡因150 mg+生理盐水至100 ml)。连续量为2 ml/h,自控量为0.5 ml/15 min。术后连续监测BP、RR、ECG、SpO2,定时观察记录视觉模拟评分法(VAS)及恶心呕吐、嗜睡、多汗、皮肤瘙痒等不良反应的发生情况。结果两组术后4 h、8 h、16 h、20 h、24 h、32 h和48 h 各时间点的VAS评分吗啡PCEA组略低于氯诺昔康PICA组,但差异无显著意义(P>0.05)。恶心、呕吐、嗜睡、多汗、皮肤瘙痒发生率PCEA组明显多于PICA组(P<0.05)。结论骨科手术后氯诺昔康PICA与吗啡 PCEA均有良好的镇痛效果,但氯诺昔康PICA组不良反应较少,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To compare the analgesic efficacy and side effects of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia(PICA) with lornoxicam and patient-controlled epidural analgesia(PCEA) with morphine in patient undergoing orthopaedics surgery. Methods 100 ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ patients scheduled for orthopaedics surgery were divided randomly into two groups:lornoxicam PICA group (n = 50), lornoxicam 48mg was diluted to 100ml with normal saline(0.9 % NS). Morphine PCEA group( n = 50), morphine 9mg + bupivacaine 150mg were diluted to 100ml with normal saline(0.9 % NS). In both groups the patients received PCA at rate of 2ml/h with the bolus does of 0.5ml and lockout interval of 15min. The loading dose was lornoxicam 8mg plus ondansetron 4mg in group PICA and morphine ling and ondansetron 4mg diluted to 10ml with normal saline(0.9% NS) in group PCEA 30 minutes before the end of operation. BP,RR, ECG, SpO2 were minitored continuously after operation. Efficacy of analgesia was assessed by VAS scores. Side effects such as drowsiness,sweat, nausea, vomiting and skin pruritus were also observed. Results There was no significant difference in the mean VAS score between group PICA and group PCEA at 4h, 8h. 16h,20h,24h,32h and 48h,after operation. There was no significant difference in side effects between the group except the occurrence of sweat, nausea, vomiting and skin pruritus which was lower in group PICA than in group PCEA(P 〈 0.05). Conclusion PICA with lornoxicam can provide satisfactory pain relief with fewer side effects compared with morphine PCEA.
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2005年第11期1506-1507,共2页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词 疼痛 手术后 矫形外科 氯诺昔康 吗啡 硬膜外自控镇痛 静脉自控镇痛 不良反应 Pain, postoperative Analgesia, patients-controned Orthopedic procedures Lornoxicam Morphine
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献26

共引文献58

同被引文献14

  • 1杜瑞明,王忱,刘怀萍.手术后氯诺昔康静脉自控镇痛的临床研究[J].中国基层医药,2005,12(5):529-530. 被引量:3
  • 2谭武菊,牛新环,李刚,傅志俭,孙巧梅.氯诺昔康对食管癌切除术病人围术期自然杀伤细胞及淋巴细胞亚群的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(1):84-85. 被引量:8
  • 3Papadima A,Lagoudianakis EE,Antonakis PT,et al.Parecoxib vs.lornoxicam in the treatment of postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy:a prospective randomized placebo-con-trolled trial.Eur J Anaesthesiol,2007,24(2):154-158. 被引量:1
  • 4Renner RM,Jensen JT,Nichols MD,et al.Pain control in first trimester surigical abortion.Cochrane Database syst Rev,2009,15(2):CD006712. 被引量:1
  • 5Chen LM,Weinberg VK,Chen C,et al.Perioperative outcomes comparing patient controlled epidural Versus intravenous analgesia in gynecologic oncology surgery.Gynecol Oncol,2009,115(3):357-361. 被引量:1
  • 6Gramke HF,Marcus MA,Sommer M,et al.Postoperative pain management:guidelines,organization and techniques.Ned Tijd-schr Geneeskd,2009,253(20):975-979. 被引量:1
  • 7Mc Cormack K.The spinal actions of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatiory drags and the dissociation between their anti-inflammatiory and analgesic effects.J Drugs,1994,47(suppl 5):28-45. 被引量:1
  • 8Rosenow D,Albrechtsen M,Stolke D.A comparison of patient-controlled analgesia with lomoxican versus morphine in patients undergoing lumbar surgery.J Anesth Analg,1998,86(5):1045-1050. 被引量:1
  • 9Monte C.Efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-flammmatory drugs in the management of postoperative pain.Drugs,1992,44(suppl 5):14-30. 被引量:1
  • 10董稳,刘瑞昌,刘克英,关明,杨旭东.氯诺昔康和舒芬太尼用于颌面外科术后自控静脉镇痛的比较[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2009,41(1):109-111. 被引量:12

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部