期刊文献+

Endoscopic mucosal resection for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus: An Italian experience 被引量:6

Endoscopic mucosal resection for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus: An Italian experience
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To evaluate endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in patients with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and/or intramucosal cancer (IMC) in Barrett's esophagus (BE). METHODS: Between June 2000 and December 2003, 39 consecutive patients with HGD (35) and/or IMC (4) underwent EMR. BE 〉30 mm was present in 27 patients. In three patients with short segment BE (25.0%), HGD was detected in a normal appearing BE. Lesions had a mean diameter of 14.8+10.3 ram. Mucosal resection was carried out using the cap method. RESULTS: The average size of resections was 19.7± 9.4×14.6+8.2 mm. Histopathologic assessment postresection revealed 5 low-grade dysplasia (LGD) (12.8%), 27 HGD (69.2%), 2 IMC (5.1%), and 5 SMC (-12.8%). EMR changed the pre-treatment diagnosis in 10 patients (25.6%). Three patients with SMC underwent surgery. Histology of the surgical specimen revealed 1 TON0 and 2 TIN0 lesions. The remaining two patients were cancer free at 32.5 and 45.6 mo, respectively. A metachronous lesion was detected after 25 mo in one patient with HGD. Intra-procedural bleeding, controlled at endoscopy, occurred in four patients (10.3%). After a median follow-up of 34.9 mo, all patients remained in remission. CONCLUSION: In the medium term, EMR is effective and safe to treat HGD and/or IMC within BE and is a valuable staging method. It could become an alternative to surgery. AIM: To evaluate endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)in patients with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and/or intramucosal cancer (IMC) in Barrett's esophagus (BE).METHODS: Between June 2000 and December 2003,39 consecutive patients with HGD (35) and/or IMC (4)underwent EMR. BE >30 mm was present in 27 patients.In three patients with short segment BE (25.0%), HGDwas detected in a normal appearing BE. Lesions had a mean diameter of 14.8±10.3 mm. Mucosal resection was carried out using the cap method.RESULTS: The average size of resections was 19.7±9.4×14.6±8.2 mm. Histopathologic assessment postresection revealed 5 low-grade dysplasia (LGD) (12.8%),27 HGD (69.2%), 2 IMC (5.1%), and 5 SMC (-12.8%).EMR changed the pre-treatment diagnosis in 10 patients (25.6%). Three patients with SMC underwehtsurgery.Histology of the surgical specimen revealed 1 T0N0 and 2 T1N0 lesions. The remaining two patients were cancer free at 32.5 and 45.6 mo, respectively. A metachronous lesion was detected after 25 mo in one patient with HGD. Intra-procedural bleeding, controlled at endoscopy,occurred in four patients (10.3%). After a median followup of 34.9 mo, all patients remained in remission.CONCLUSION: In the medium term, EMR is effective and safe to treat HGD and/or IMC within BE and is a valuable staging method. It could become an alternative to surgery.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2005年第42期6650-6655,共6页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Endoscopic mucosal resection Barrett'sesophagus High-grade dysplasia Intramucosal cancer 内窥镜 发育异常 黏膜癌 巴雷特食管 意大利
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1[1]Blot WJ,Devesa SS,Kneller RW,Fraumeni JF Jr.Rising incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia.JAMA 1991; 265:1287-1289 被引量:1
  • 2[2]Bollschweiler E,Wolfgarten E,Gutschow C,Holscher AH.Demographic variations in the rising incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in white males.Cancer 2001; 92:549-555 被引量:1
  • 3[3]Conio M,Lapertosa G,Bianchi S,Filiberti R.Barrett's esophagus:an update.Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2003; 46:187-206 被引量:1
  • 4[4]Conio M,Blanchi S,Lapertosa G,Ferraris R,Sablich R,Marchi S,D'Onofrio V,Lacchin T,Iaquinto G,Missale G,Ravelli P,Cestari R,Benedetti G,Macri G,Fiocca R,Munizzi F,Filiberti R.Long-term endoscopic surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus.Incidence of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma:a prospective study.Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98:1931-1939 被引量:1
  • 5[5]Shaheen NJ,Crosby MA,Bozymski EM,Sandler RS.Is there publication bias in the reporting of cancer risk in Barrett's esophagus? Gastroenterology 2000; 119:333-338 被引量:1
  • 6[6]Reid BJ,Levine DS,Longton G,Blount PL,Rabinovitch PS.Predictors of progression to cancer in Barrett's esophagus:baseline histology and flow cytometry identify low-and highrisk patient subsets.Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95:1669-1676 被引量:1
  • 7[7]Schnell TG,Sontag SJ,Chejfec G,Aranha G,Metz A,O'Connell S,Seidel UJ,Sonnenberg A.Long-term nonsurgical management of Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia.Gastroenterology 2001; 120:1607-1619 被引量:1
  • 8[8]Weston AP,Sharma P,Topalovski M,Richards R,Cherian R,Dixon A.Long-term follow-up of Barrett's high-grade dysplasia.Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95:1888-1893 被引量:1
  • 9[9]Cameron AJ,Carpenter HA.Barrett's esophagus,high-grade dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma:a pathologic study.Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92:586-591 被引量:1
  • 10[10]Korst RJ,Altorki NK.High-grade dysplasia:surveillance,mucosal ablation,or resection? World J Surg 2003; 27:1030-1034 被引量:1

同被引文献91

引证文献6

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部