期刊文献+

胰腺癌血清肿瘤标志物之间的互补性 被引量:3

Complementarity Between Serum Tumor Markers in Pancreatic Carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究胰腺癌诊断中常用血清肿瘤标志物之间的互补性,探讨最佳单项和组合指标确立的依据。方法分析CA242、CA19-9、CA15-3、CA125、CA50和CEA6个指标在315例胰腺癌和181例良性疾病中相互之间的Spearman相关性,计算各指标ROC曲线下面积并进行Logistic回归分析,按照试剂盒提供的参考值计算肿瘤标志物单一和组合分析时的诊断参数。结果单一肿瘤标志物以CA242和CA19-9的ROC曲线下面积(0.78vs0.76,P=0.195)最大;除了CA242与CEA和CA15-3之间各不相关外(P>0.05),其他所有指标两两之间均显著相关(P<0.01)。回归分析只有CA242和CEA被纳入回归方程(P<0.05),样本分类准确率达81.5%;两指标并联后的Youden指数(0.51)在所有单项和组合分析中最大,与CA242单项比较,敏感性和特异性均有升高趋势但无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论ROC曲线和Logistic回归是确立最佳单项和组合指标的合理统计分析方法;不相关指标之间互补性强,成为优化组合的基础;胰腺癌诊断中以CA242和CA19-9单项或CA242+CEA联合分析为首选。 Objective To study the complementarity of serum tumor markers measurement, so as to find the best single item and their optimal combination in diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. Methods Spearman correlation, binary logistic regression and ROC curve was performed on 6 serum tumor markers measurements in 315 patients with pancreatic carcinoma and 181 benign diseases. Diagnostic parameters of the tumor markers were calculated according to reference values recommended by the kits. Results Both CA242 and CA19-9 had the largest area under the ROC curve (0.78 vs 0. 76, P = 0. 195) among the 6 tumor markers. Significant correlation was found between all tumor markers (P 〈0.0l) , except between CA242 and CEA or CA15-3 (P 〉 0.05). Only CA242 and CEA were included in the model of logistic regression, reached an accuracy of 81.5% , and obtained the largest Youden index (0.51) among all combination patterns, but had insignificant increase in both sensitivity and specificity in comparison with CA242 alone (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion ROC curve and logistic regression are reseanable statistical approaches to specify the best and optimal single or combined tumor markers in a certain malignancy. There was good complementarity among uncorrelated tumor markers and thus forms strong evidence for optimal combination. CA242 and CA19-9 alone or CA242 + CEA should be first choice measurement in diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma
出处 《上海第二医科大学学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2005年第12期1239-1241,共3页 Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Secondae Shanghai
关键词 肿瘤标志物 互补性 胰腺癌 血清 tumor markers complementarity pancreatic carcinoma
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Vassilakopoulos T,Troupis T,Sotiropoulou C,et al.Diagnostic and prognostic significance of squamous cell carcinoma antigen in nonsmall cell lung cancer [ J ].Lung Cancer,2001,32 (2):137-144. 被引量:1
  • 2Gion M,Mione R,Leon AE,et al.CA27.29:a valuable marker for breast cancer management.A confirmatory multicentric study on 603 eases[J].EurJCancer,2001,37(3):355-363. 被引量:1
  • 3Trape J,Molina R,Sant F.Clinical evaluation of the simultaneous determination of tumor markers in fluid and serum and their ratio in the differential diagnosis of serous effusions[ J].Tumor Biol,2004,25(56):276-281. 被引量:1
  • 4McIntosh MW,Drescher C,Karlan B,et al.Combining CA125 and SMR serum markers for diagnosis and early detection of ovarian carcinoma[ J].Gynecol Oncol,2004,95 (1):9-15. 被引量:1
  • 5Uenishi T,Kubo S,Hirohashi K,et al.Cytokeratin-19 fragments(CYFRA21-1) in serum as a marker in primary liver cancer [ J].Bri J Cancer,2003,88 (12):1894-1899. 被引量:1
  • 6王国洪,万文徽,刘波,刘娟,张书耕,梁震,杨江颖,张晶,董大海.四种肿瘤标志检测非小细胞肺癌的临床应用研究[J].中华检验医学杂志,2003,26(8):491-494. 被引量:51
  • 7高云朝,陆云,程伟,邓守真,高泉,张学平,吴文清,倪泉兴,刘兴党,林祥通.血清肿瘤标志物在胰腺癌诊断中的选择[J].上海医学,2005,28(4):330-331. 被引量:6
  • 8武建国.血清肿瘤标志物检测中值得注意的问题[J].中华医学检验杂志,1997,20(1):7-8. 被引量:27
  • 9陈允硕,吴健民.肿瘤标志物临床检测的基本原则(建议稿)[J].中华检验医学杂志,2004,27(6):393-393. 被引量:35
  • 10Hayakawa T,Naruse S,Kitagawa M,et al.A prospective multicenter trial evaluating diagnostic validity of multivariate analysis and individual serum marker in differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer from benign pancreatic diseases [ J ].Int J Panc,1999,25 (1):23-29. 被引量:1

二级参考文献12

共引文献112

同被引文献21

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部