摘要
[目的]观察32例(36颗牙)牙根纵裂的修复及疗效.[方法]采用牙体半切术切除32例 (36颗牙)纵裂牙根,余留牙体分别以单端固定桥修复(12例)和双端固定桥修复(20例).[结果]修复治疗后6～12个月复查,疗效为成功35颗,失败1颗,两种修复类型之间差异有显著性(P<0.05).[结论]使用牙体半切术结合固定修复方法,可有效地保留老年人牙根纵裂的患牙.
[Objective]To observe the curative effect of fixed bridge on the molars with vertical split . [Methods]Thirty-six molars with vertical split were treated by teeth hemisection first, then rigid fixed bridge （20 cases） or cantilever fixed bridge （12 cases） were used to restore the remaining teethstructures. [Results] After 6-12 months follow-up, treatment of 35 molars was successful, 1 failed. There was significant difference between the two different types of fixed bridge（ P 〈0.05）. [Conclusion]Hemisection combined with fixed restorations can be used to restore molars with vertical split effectively.
出处
《医学临床研究》
CAS
2005年第12期1695-1696,共2页
Journal of Clinical Research
关键词
牙裂/治疗
牙修复体修补
dental fissures/TH
dental prosthesis repair
