期刊文献+

从天命史观向社会进化史观的过渡——论清代学人为中国社会自我演变所做的史观准备 被引量:1

From the Mandate of Heaven to Social Evolution——On Historic Views Prepared by Scholars of Qing Dynasty for Chinese Social Evolution
原文传递
导出
摘要 由“公羊学”所宣扬的天命史观,是将社会的变化视为天道运行“副本”的观念。它既宣扬“君权天授”,又承认“天命所授者博,非独一姓”,认定社会在周期性的循环中发展。但在整个中世纪,“君权天授”的观念一直是维护家天下专制制度的精神武器。在从古代社会向近代转型的过程中,“前清”学者在批评天命史观时,将主宰人类命运主体的“天”置换为“社会”;到了清代中期,“常州”学人则注意到“天命”史学中所包含的变易思想;晚清之时,恰遇“千年未遇之变局”,康有为等一方面援引前清学者的社会主体观念,另一方面则直接将公羊学的变易思想与西学相对接,于是,“通三统”、“张三世”、“《春秋》当新王”便被改造成社会进化论学说。 “Gong Yang theory” advocates the mandate of heaven, considering social change as a copy of the heavenly order. It proclaims the emperor is empowered by the heaven, and, on the other, believes in the cyclic development of society. The idea of the emperor empowered by the heaven used to be the spiritual backbone of feudal despotic regimes. In the process of social transformation from the feudal to the modern, scholars in early Qing period replaced “heaven” with “society” as the supreme power that determines human destiny in their criticism of the mandate of the heaven. In middle Qing period, scholars of Changzhou school took notice of the conception of “ change” in the idea of the mandate of the heaven. In late Qing period, Kang Youwei and his students, having inherited the no- tion of social determination and attempting to weld the idea of change in Gong Yang theory with West- ern thoughts, transformed such conceptions as “three-era cycle”, “three-era evolution” and “Confucius's writing Spring and Autumn in order to establish a new dynasty” into a theory of social evolution, and thus laid an ideological foundation for their democratic reform movement.
作者 茭公
出处 《南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第6期47-56,共10页 Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy,Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金 江苏省哲学社会科学研究基金项目(04LSA001)
关键词 春秋公羊传 天命史学 常州学人 社会进化论 Biography of Gong Yang in Spring and Autumn ( Chunqiu Gong Yang zhuan) themandate of heaven in history studies scholars of Changzhou school social evolution
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1叶瑛.文史通义校注:上[M].北京:中华书局,1994.. 被引量:1
  • 2(清)阮元.十三经注疏(附样勘记):下[M].北京:中华书局,1991.. 被引量:1
  • 3苏舆.春秋繁露义证[M].北京:中华书局,1992.. 被引量:282
  • 4(宋)司马光编著,(元)胡三省音注..资治通鉴 上[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1990:1080.
  • 5.船山全书:第1册[M].长沙:岳麓书社,1988.. 被引量:2
  • 6邹贤俊编..中国古代史学理论 要录[M].武汉:湖北人民出版社,1990:517.
  • 7朱维铮.梁启超论清学史二种[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1985.. 被引量:21
  • 8黄宗羲.明夷待访录[M].古籍出版社,1957.. 被引量:5
  • 9梁启超著..饮冰室合集[M].北京:中华书局,1989:11147.
  • 10杨向奎.清儒学案新编:一[M].济南:齐鲁书社,1985.. 被引量:2

共引文献407

同被引文献12

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部