摘要
生产能力预定的期权契约是供应链协调的一种常见形式。文中分析期权契约协调下供应链的交易成本分配和电子佣金的支付。指出在单销售商—单供应商系统的传统市场中,在供应链协调时,销售商通过执行价格将其一半的交易成本转移至供应商。在在线逆向拍卖(ORA)中,当电子佣金由销售商支付时,供应链协调不能实现;而由供应商的赢者支付,供应链协调的必要条件是电子佣金小于可变生产成本。
The contract with capacity reservation options is the common instrument of supply chain coordination. The paper analyzes the allocation of transaction cost and the payment of e-commis.sion of supply chain under the coordination of contract with options. It is concluded that on traditional market with one-retailer and one-supplier, the transaction cost of the retailer is transferred to the supplier by half while supply chain is coordinated by means of execution price; on online reverse auction with multi-suppliers and one-retailer, supply chain coordination doesn＇t realize when the retailer pays the e-commission; if the winning supplier pays the e-commission, the necessary condition for the supply chain coordination is that the e-commission is lower than the variable production cost.
出处
《预测》
CSSCI
2005年第6期61-66,共6页
Forecasting
基金
国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(70031020)
关键词
供应链协调
期权契约
交易成本
电子佣金
supply chain coordination
contract with options
transaction cost
e-commission
