摘要
萨特的“反思”概念的本体论内涵与心理学的“反思”概念的差异:二者之间的对立首先体现于对时间性的理解,其次体现于思索“欲望”的不同的角度。心理学把“欲望”自在化、外在化、抽象化,而存在的精神分析则把欲望作为自为的根本存在方式。通过福楼拜的案例,萨特分析了个体根本性的生存欲望如何超越自在的语言而获得真正的“表达”和“写作”。最后,我们比较了德勒兹的欲望—生成的理论和萨特的欲望理论之间的区别。
This paper focuses on Sartre's ontology of desire and basic characteristics of his psychanalyse existentielle which is based on the former.His writing on Flaubert L'Idiot de la famille is no doubt an outstanding case of such psychoanalysis.The first is a clarification of his central concept,reflexion,which is different from that of psychology.The opposition is mainly embodied in their completely different understandings of temporality.From this point Sartre's ontology of desire is distinguished from a psychological analysis of desire only as a psychological entity.Through his psychoanalysis,Sartre shows how Flaubert overcame the opposition tetween his basic desire of pour-soi and the laguage as en-soi to have successfully created his own ideal world.As for Deleuze,instead of reflecting on things,which is typical of modernism,philosophers should do creations and experiments;therefore,desire is neighter manqué d'etre nor original totality of pro-ject.Desire is always an experiment in becoming.
出处
《华东师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第6期49-54,共6页
Journal of East China Normal University（Humanities and Social Sciences）
关键词
反思
欲望
写作
聚合
reflection,desire,writing,assemblage
