摘要
近年,全球反倾销与反补贴调查案件逐年下降,而WTO争端解决机构受理的因成员国使用保障措施而引发的争议案件日益上升。近年,中国产品出口迅猛增长的同时,贸易摩擦频发;大量进口的同时也可能使国内某些产业受到损害,引起不良连锁反应。国家经济安全警钟长鸣。笔者对反倾销、反补贴以及保障措施全球实施情况进行数据分析,对《反倾销协议》、《补贴与反补贴措施协议》和《保障措施协议》3种措施从多方面进行了比较并用表格加以简要归纳,进而提出:近年不断增加的保障措施实施案例表明保障措施作为多边贸易体制的“安全阀”将被更多地采用。过去,中国很少采用保障措施,而《入世议定书》的“特保措施”使得他国能够对华采取歧视性的保障措施,因此,充分利用“发展中成员方”的优惠条件,充分了解、学会正确使用保障措施是当务之急。作为进口方,不能将保障措施作为万能膏药随意滥用,应合理使用保障措施、选择合理的保护部门。作为出口方,应提高产品技术含量,关注最新变化,适时改变出口策略,适度控制出口数量,实现出口产品的有序增长,“走出去”进行跨国经营以绕开它国壁垒。
In recent years, investigation cases of anti-dumping and countervailing have been declining globally, while the dispure cases induced by safeguard measures being taken by retevant countries accepted by WTO dispute settlement body are rising. With the rapid growth of Chinese commodities export, trade conflicts frequently occurred. Certain industries would be injured when too much commodities are imported forming a malignant chain reaction. It is always necessary to alert in national economy. Data from global implementation of anti-dumping, countervailing, and safeguard measures are analyzed. Measures of “anti-dumping agreement”, “subsidy and countervailing measures agreement”and “safeguard measures agreement” are multi-laterally compared and briefly compiled and listed in a table. It points out that the ever increasing cases of the implementing safeguard measures demonstrate that as the safety valve in multi-lateral trade the safeguard measures would be used more frequently.However, they should not be overused. The importing should choose the right sectors to be protected and avoid overusirg safeguard measures. The exporting country should keep track of changes and adjust accordingly through raising the technological level instead of simply enlarging export volume of low-value commodities. Transnational investment would be appropriate for avoiding trade barriers.
出处
《中国安全科学学报》
CAS
CSCD
2005年第10期15-20,共6页
China Safety Science Journal
关键词
救济
保障措施(协议)
反倾销
反补贴
经济安全
relief
agreement on safeguard measures
anti-dumping
countervailing
economic safety
