期刊文献+

吸入激素联合缓释茶碱与吸入双倍剂量激素治疗哮喘疗效对比

Comparative Study on Therapeutic Effect of Inhaled Corticosteroid Combined with Theophylline and Double dose Inhaled Corticosteroid in Asthmatics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较吸入激素(ICS)联合缓释茶碱(SRT)和吸入双倍剂量ICS对哮喘患者的疗效及不良反应。方法:42例哮喘患者随机分成2组。A组22例,予布地奈得联合SRT 0.2/d;B组予相应级别双倍剂量。疗程6个月。比较治疗前后临床疗效、肺功能及血浆皮质醇浓度的变化。结果:治疗后2组患者症状评分较治疗前明显降低。2组比较无显著差异。治疗前后血浆皮质醇浓度差异无统计学意义。结论:ICS联合SRT和双倍剂量ICS治疗哮喘疗效相当。未见HAPP抑制的不良反应。 Objective: To compare the therapeutic effect of ICS combined with slow release SRT to double dose ICS in asthmatics. Method: 42 asthmatics subjects were randomaly divided into group A and B. 22 cases in group A received 200μg-800μg budesonide ( BUD ) daily with SRT 0.1 twice daily for 6 months. 20 cases received double dose budesonede daily for 6 months. During the six months,FEVl ,PEF, clinical effects, and plasma cortisol level were evaluated. Result: Significant decreases were observed in symptom scores after treatment with ICS plus SRT or double dose of ICS ,however ,no difference between two groups. And no significant change in plasma cortisol level. Conclusion: Both ICS combined with SRT and double dosage of ICS have equivalent effects in relieving symptoms in asthma therapy and it did not induce suppression of HAPP axis function in the patients.
出处 《河北医学》 CAS 2005年第12期1071-1073,共3页 Hebei Medicine
关键词 哮喘 吸入激素 茶碱 Asthma Inhaled corticosteroid Thephylline
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献17

  • 1Agertoft L, Pedersen S. Effect of long-term treatment with inhaled budesonide on adult height in children with asthma.N Engl J Med, 2000,343:1064-1069. 被引量:1
  • 2Mcivor RA, Pizzichini E, Turner MO, et al.Potential masking effects of salmeterol on airway inflammation in asthma.Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1998,158:924-930. 被引量:1
  • 3Kips JC, O′Connor BJ, Inman MD, et al.A long-term study of the antiinflammatory effect of low-dose budesonide plus formoterol versus high-dose budesonide in asthma.Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2000,161(3 Pt 1):996-1001. 被引量:1
  • 4Jenkins C, Woolcock AJ, Saarelainen P, et al.Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination therapy 50/250 microg twice daily is more effective than budesonide 800 microg twice daily in treating moderate to severe asthma.Respir Med,2000,94:715-723. 被引量:1
  • 5Evans DJ, Taylor DA, Zetterstrom O, et al.A comparison of low-dose inhaled budesonide plus theophylline and high-dose inhaled budesonide for moderate asthma.N Engl J Med,1997,337:1412-1418. 被引量:1
  • 6Storms W, Michele TM, Knorr B,et al.Clinical safety and tolerability of montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, in controlled clinical trials in patients aged > or = 6 years.Clin Exp Allergy,2001,31:77-87. 被引量:1
  • 7Stempel DA, Mauskopf J, McLaughlin T, et al.Comparison of asthma costs in patients starting fluticasone propionate compared to patients starting montelukast.Respir Med,2001,95:227-234. 被引量:1
  • 8Stempel DA, Stanford RH, McLaughlin T, et al. Six month claims analysis demonstrates that montelukast is associated with a significantly larger increase in asthma care costs than fluticasone propionate. Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2000,161:A407. 被引量:1
  • 9Malmstrom K, Rodriguez-Gomez G, Guerra J, et al.Oral montelukast, inhaled beclomethasone, and placebo for chronic asthma. A randomized, controlled trial. Montelukast/Beclomethasone Study Group.Ann Intern Med,1999,130:487-495. 被引量:1
  • 10Bousquet J, D′Urzo A, Hebert J, et al.Comparison of the efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler to budesonide Turbuhaler.Eur Respir J,2000,16:808-816. 被引量:1

共引文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部