期刊文献+

澳门改善固体废弃物管理的总经济价值评估 被引量:8

Economic Assessment of a Solid Waste Management Program in Macao by Contingent Valuation Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对目前澳门固体废弃物管理存在的问题,应用二分式条件价值评估法以居民支付意愿的方式研究了实施垃圾减量化策略的固体废弃物管理方案在澳门的总经济价值。结果表明,80.56%的居民对该固体废弃物管理方案存在支付意愿,其平均支付意愿为每人每月19.50MOP,将这一结果推广到面上,得到澳门改善固体废弃物管理的年总经济价值为8.45×107MOP,影响澳门居民支付意愿的因素主要包括澳门居民的固体废弃物管理意识、受教育水平和家庭月总收入等。 The contingent valuation method (CVM) is a direct interview approach that can be used to provide acceptable assessment of the economic value of environmental goods or services. This paper reports an attempt to apply the CVM to estimate the economic values of a new solid waste management program with waste minimization strategy in Macao. A random sample survey of 260 respondents in Macao was conducted during the summer in 2004. About 80.56% stated that they would be willing to pay for this new solid waste management program. The estimation results show that the mean willingness-to-pay (WTP) of Macao public for this new solid waste management program was about MOP 19.50 per person per month and the total economic value of this program was 8.45×10^7 MOP annually. The determinants of WTP were respondents' concern about solid waste management, the education levels and the total household income of the respondents. The reported models are feasible, having high explanatory power and variables that are statistically significant and consistent with expectations.
出处 《中国人口·资源与环境》 CSSCI 2005年第6期122-125,共4页 China Population,Resources and Environment
基金 澳门大学科研基金(RG012/03-04S/WZS/FST)资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献68

  • 1[11]Bateman I J, Langford I H, Turner R K,et al. Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 12:161-179. 被引量:1
  • 2[12]Bonnieux F, Rainelli P. Contingent valuation methodology and the EU institutional framework [A]. In: Bateman I J, Willis K G, eds. Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries[C]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. 585-612. 被引量:1
  • 3[13]Carson R T. Valuation of tropical rainforests: Philosophical and practical issues in the use of contingent valuation [J]. Ecological Economics, 1998, 24: 15-29. 被引量:1
  • 4[14]Loomis J B, Kent P, Strange L, et al. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: Results from a contingent valuation survey [J]. Ecological Economics, 2000, 33: 103-117. 被引量:1
  • 5[15]Jorgenson B S, Wilson M A, Heberlein T A. Fairness in the contingent valuation of environmental public goods: Attitude toward paying for environmental improvements at two levels of scope [J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 36(1): 133-148. 被引量:1
  • 6[17]Lovett A, Bateman I J. Economic analysis of environmental preferences: Progress and prospects [J]. Computer, Environment and Urban systems, 2001, 25: 131-139. 被引量:1
  • 7[18]Smith V K. Non-market valuation of environmental resources: An interpretive appraisal [J]. Land Economics, 1993, 69: 1-26. 被引量:1
  • 8[19]Brown T C, Gregory R. Why the WTP-WTA disparity matters [J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 28: 323-335. 被引量:1
  • 9[20]Hanemann W M. The economic theory of WTP and WTA [A]. In: Bateman I J, Willis K G, eds. Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries[C]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.42-96. 被引量:1
  • 10[21]Bishop R C, Heberlein T A. Measuring values of extra-Market goods: Are indirect measures biased? [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1979, 61(5): 926-930. 被引量:1

共引文献411

同被引文献140

引证文献8

二级引证文献94

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部