摘要
学界对《毛诗》在汉代初年“不列于学”的原因虽早有较为一致的看法,但如果仅将其简单归结为今古文之争的话,不仅显得过于笼统,而且也忽略了观念背后的更为复杂的内在动因。因为汉代四家《诗》学的发展变迁情况是极其复杂的,《毛诗》在汉初没有被列于学官的原因也是多方面的,这其中除了传授和传播《毛诗》的大小毛公身处封国而与中央政府的关系较为疏远一个外在原因外,汉初《诗经》学发展的可能性空间、《毛诗》本身的解诗理论与统治者现实政治需要的差距等,都不同程度地对《毛诗》的政治命运和学术命运产生过重要影响。
Though a unanimous agreement is reached in the early Han Dynasty that Mao＇s Poetry is not considered as academic, it is obviously ignorant and rather too general for us to conclude that the dispute is a historical one. Therefore, the writers of the paper disclose that the four schools of Mao＇s Poetry in Han undergo much too complicated changes in the historical course. And the paper concludes that due to multifaceted reasons, the developmental space of the academicians of Mao＇s Poetry, the anthological principles and political requisites of the rulers all affect the reinterpretation of Mao＇s Poetry.
出处
《河北师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
北大核心
2005年第6期89-95,共7页
Journal of Hebei Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词
《毛诗》
汉初
“不列于学”
原因
Mao＇s Poetry
early Han Dynasty
non-academic
reasons
