期刊文献+

心肺功能运动试验与静态肺功能判定肺损伤的比较 被引量:3

Comparison of cardiopulmonary exercise test with resting pulmonary function test in evaluating pulmonary impairment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较心肺功能运动试验与静态肺功能测定结果的灵敏度和特异度,探讨心肺功能运动试验在尘肺伤残程度鉴定中的运用。方法选取Ⅰ期煤工尘肺病人69名,正常对照182名,所有对象进行心肺功能运动试验和静态肺功能测定;计算灵敏度、特异度,判断肺损伤的一致性和相关性。结果静态肺功能指标中,FVC特异度最高(91.2%),但灵敏度最低(28.9%);RV/TLC%灵敏度最高(84.5%),但特异度最低(61.5%)。在运动试验指标中,最大摄氧量和调整的最大二氧化碳通气当量的特异度分别为97.4%和93.5%,灵敏度仅为34.4%和75.0%,似然比、准确率高于静态肺功能指标。运动试验指标与静态肺功能指标判断损伤之间有相关性和一致性,但相关程度和一致程度不高。结论运动试验指标与静态肺功能指标在相同程度肺损伤评定上有很大差异,静态肺功能不能准确评定体力能力的大小和丧失,在我国尘肺伤残评定方面应考虑采用心肺功能运动试验。 Objective To compare the sensitivity and specificity of cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) with those of resting pulmonary function test (PFT), in order to approach to applying CPET for evaluating the impairment and disability of pulmonary function due to pneumoconiosis. Method Totally, 251 subjects were recruited and divided into two group, 69 patients with pneumoconiosis of stage Ⅰ, and 182 normal controls unexposed to dust. They were determined by CPET and resting PFT. The sensitivity and specificity of the tests, and consistence and correlation between CPET and resting PFT were calculated. Result In PFT, FVC% showed the highest specificity (91.2%) and the lowest sensitivity (28.9%), but RV/TLC% showed the highest sensitivity (84.5%) and the lowest specificity (61.5%). However, in CPET, the specificity of maximal oxygen upfake (VO2zmax) and adjusted maximal ventilator), equivalent for CO2 (AdVE/VCO2max) were 97.4% and 93.5%, respectively, and the sensitivities of those were 34.4% and 75.0%, respectively. The likelihood ratio and accuracy of CPET were higher than those of resting PFT. There were only weak or moderate correlationship and consistence between CPET and resting PFT. Conclusion There existed a large difference in judging pulmonary impairment of the same degree between CPET and resting PFT. Maximal physical capacity and its loss could not precisely be predicted by resting PFT. For our country, CPET should be considered to use in evaluating pulmonary function impairment due to pneumoconiosis.
出处 《中国工业医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2005年第5期269-272,共4页 Chinese Journal of Industrial Medicine
关键词 心肺功能运动试验 静态肺功能 尘肺 损害/伤残 评价 Cardiopulmonary exercise test Resting pulmonary function test Pneumoconiosis Impairment/disability Evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Oren A, Sue DY, Hansen JE, et al. The role of exercise testing impairment evaluation [J]. America Rev Respir Dis, 1987, 135: 230-235. 被引量:1
  • 2GB/T16180—96.职工工伤与职业病致残程度鉴定标准[S].[S].,.. 被引量:2
  • 3Zeballos R J, Behind the scenes of cardiopulmonary excise testing [J].Clin Chest Medicine, 1994, 15 (2): 193-213. 被引量:1
  • 4Weisman LM, Zeballos P,j. An integrated approach to the interpretation of cardiopulmonary exercise testing [J]. Clin Chest Med, 1994, 15 (2):421-425. 被引量:1
  • 5王绵珍,王治明,王晓蓉,朱蓉,谭义蓉.应用六项肺功能指标进行肺功能损伤分级鉴定的探讨[J].职业卫生与应急救援,1997,15(1):13-14. 被引量:2
  • 6Vidal MF,Barazanji K, Winga E, et al. Estimate of pulmonary diffusing capacity for oxygen during exercise in humans from routine O(2) and CO(2) measurements [J]. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging, 2004, 24 (1): 46-57. 被引量:1
  • 7Fink G, Moshe S, Goshen J, et al. Functional evaluation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: pulmonary function test versus cardiopulmonary exercise test [ J ]. J Occup Environ Med, 2002, 44 ( 1 ) :54-58. 被引量:1
  • 8Smith DD. Pulmonary impairment/disability evaluation: controversies and criticisms [J]. Clin Pulm Med, 1995, 2: 334-343. 被引量:1
  • 9Sue DY. Exercise testing in the evaluation of impairment and disability [J]. Clin Chest Medicine, 1994, 15 (2): 369-387. 被引量:1
  • 10Cotes JE. Rating resplr disability: a report on behalf of workgroup of the European society for clinic respiratory physiology [ J ]. Euro Resp J,1990, 3: 1074. 被引量:1

二级参考文献2

共引文献2

同被引文献52

引证文献3

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部