摘要
目的:探讨父母教养方式对大学生心理健康影响的作用。方法:①调查于2004-09/12在郑州铁路职业技术学院医学分院完成。以单纯随机抽样的方法从郑州铁路职业技术学院医学分院护理专业大一、大二、大三每个年级中各抽取55人,共165人。被试者均自愿参加评估。②被试心理健康状况评估采用症状自评量表(有90个陈述句构成,根据自己最近1周的实际情况分4级回答,记1～4分,1为无,2为轻度,3为较重,4为严重。量表还包括9个因子:躯体化、强迫、人际关系、抑郁、焦虑、敌对、恐怖、偏执、精神病)。以全国青年常模为对照。③父母教养方式评估采用父母教养方式问卷(分4个等级,记1～4分,1为从不,2为偶尔,3为经常,4为总是;该量表还包括11个因子,父亲养育6个分量表:情感温暖、理解,惩罚严厉、过分干涉、偏爱被试、拒绝否认、过度保护58个条目;母亲养育5个分量表:情感温暖、理解,过分干涉,拒绝否认,惩罚严厉,偏爱被试57个条目,11个分量表由66个陈述句构成)。④计量资料差异比较采用t检验。结果:①大学生165人均进入结果分析并完成量表和问卷评估。②接受情感温暖理解教养方式教育的大学生症状自评量表各因子分与全国青年常模相近。③接受父母拒绝否认教养方式教育的大学生人际关系敏感、抑郁、敌对、恐怖、偏执、精神病性因子分明显高于接受父母情感温暖理解教养方式教育的大学生(t=1.81～2.27,P<0.05)。④人际关系敏感、敌对、恐怖、精神病性因子分明显高于接受父母情感温暖理解教养方式教育的大学生(t=1.72～1.88,P<0.05)。⑤接受父母惩罚严厉教养方式教育的大学生强迫、人际关系敏感、焦虑、偏执、精神病性因子分明显高于接受父母情感温暖理解教养方式教育的大学生(t=1.94～4.75,P<0.05～0.01)。结论:接受父母情感温暖理解教养方式教育的大�
AIM： To discuss effects of various education methods of parents on psychological health of undergraduates. METHODS：① The investigation was done in the Medical College of Zhengzhou Railway Vocational and Technical College between September and December 2004. Totally 165 students were drew out from grade one, two and three with 55 students in each grade from Nursing Department, Medical College of Zhengzhou Railway Vocational and Technical College with the simple random sampling. The testees were all joined the evaluation voluntarily.② The symptom checklist （composed of 90 declarative sentences, and divided into 4 grades according to the actual condition of the latest one week, 1-4 points, I for none, 2 for mild, 3 for more severe, 4 for most severe; The scale also included 9 factors： somatization, compulsion, human relation, depression, anxiety, rivalry, panic, intolerance and mental illness） was used to test the psychological health status. The national youth norms were as control.③Parents education questionnaire （including 4 grades, 1-4 points, 1 for never, 2 for sometime, 3 for usually and 4 for always; That scale also included 11 factors, 6 sub-scales of father education： feeling, understanding, severe punishment, excessive interference, partialism, denial to deny and overprotection,58 items; 5 sub-scales of mother education： feeling, understanding, excessive interference, denial to deny, severe punishment and partialism,57 items, the 11 sub-scale was composed of 66 declarative sentences） was used to evaluate the parents education method.④ The comparison of the difference of measurement data was done by t-test. RESULTS：① Totally 165 undergraduates were involved in the result analysis, and the evaluation of scale and questionnaire was done.② The score of every factor of the symptom checklist in the undergraduate who received the education method of feeling and understanding was closed to that of the national youth norm. ③ The score of the factors of human relation sensitivity, d
出处
《中国临床康复》
CSCD
北大核心
2005年第32期110-111,共2页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation
