摘要
关于知识定义的传统分析自从葛梯尔问题出现之后就陷入了困境。反思“知道”与“知识”的区别,指出传统分析所体现的“主体—客体”二元认识模式的缺陷,从“知识的功能”角度反思“知识的条件是什么”,从讨论和解决“知识是否具有客观有效性”、“客观有效性是否就是公共性”、“公共性是否是确证知识的合理条件”等问题,可为知识的准确定义提供新途径。
The traditional analysis of knowledge＇s definition had been severely challenged since Gettier problem arised. Any solution now we have can not solve all the problems we meet in the challenge. What will be our way to work for？ In this article, we will reflect the difference between “know” and “knowledge”, and show the default of the “subject-object” format in the traditional analysis. We will think about “What is the function of knowledge？” and “What is the condition of knowledge？” We will discuss questions, such as “Does knowledge have objectivity？”, “Is objectivity intersubjectire？”, and “Is intersubjectivity the reasonable condition of justification of knowledge？” Then finally, we will try to find out a new approach to the knowledge definition.
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第9期47-51,68,共6页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词
知识定义
客观有效性
公共性
knowledge definition
objectivity
intersubjectivity
