摘要
针对唱片公司与KTV经营者之间著作权纠纷以及MTV的性质问题在法律实务界的争论,分析了MTV的特点及其与电影作品、录像制品的区别,讨论了版权与邻接权的界限问题,得出结论:MTV应当归入邻接的范围,但法律应当赋予MTV制作人放映权,并建议通过著作权集体管理组织解决MTV使用收费问题。
In view of the dissension between record company and KTV manager on work copyright as well as the argument of the nature of MTV in law practice, this paper analyzes the nature of MTV as well as the differences between MTV and film and video works, discusses the issue of copyrights and neighboring rights, and finally reaches the conclusion ： MTV should fall into neighboring rights category,but the maker of MTV should be entitled by law the right of showing. It is suggested to solve the problem of fee charging for using MTV through the mass management organization of copyright.
出处
《重庆工学院学报》
2005年第7期66-68,72,共4页
Journal of Chongqing Institute of Technology
关键词
MTV
电影作品
录像制品
版权
邻接权
MTV
film works
video recording
copyrights
neighboring rights
