摘要
《公司法》第六十条第三款通说认为是对公司担保能力的限制。对违反这一限制的法律后果,无论是学界还是司法实践中都存在认识上的分歧。在当事人违反法律禁止性规定而导致担保合同无效的情况下,课以公司严格责任,不利于保护公司及其股东的利益,《担保法司法解释》体现了保护债权人利益的价值取向。
Item 3 Article 60 of Company Law of the People＇s Republic of China is generally regarded as a qualification of business guarantee capacity. There exist cognitive divergences in either the academia or the legal practice as to the legal consequences of the violation of the qualification. Imposing strict responsibility upon business firms when invalidity of guarantee contract results from some principal＇ s violation of the qualification does not conduce to the protection of the interest of the firms and shareholders.
出处
《四川师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第5期61-65,共5页
Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
四川省教育厅青年基金项目"中国公司法制现代化研究"
编号SB03-024
关键词
公司
担保
法律后果
价值取向
business firm
guarantee
legal consequence
value orientation
