摘要
对因伪造、变造而票据错误付款的损失应由何人负担,各国立法不尽相同。最高人民法院关于审理票据纠纷案件有关规定就票据伪造变造的风险承担做出了规定,但失之偏颇。对于如何完善我国票据伪造风险负担制度,应结合外国立法、国际公约的有关规定。
Who should tade the consequences of the risk brought by the payment of note that was fabricated？ Different countries have different legislations. The regulation of judge of disputation of note of the Supre court has some provisions on who should take the consequences of the risk brought by the payment of note that was fabricated. But some provisions are not proper. We should Combine the relevant Stipulation of foreign legislative and international pact.
出处
《现代财经（天津财经大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第9期64-66,71,共4页
Modern Finance and Economics：Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics
关键词
票据伪造
票据变造
风险负担
Fabricated the Note
Faked the Note
Take the Consequences of the Risk
