期刊文献+

否弃集体作者观——民间文艺版权难题的终结 被引量:52

Abandoning the Notion of Collective Authorship:The End of the Problem of Folk Literature Copyright
原文传递
导出
摘要 对民间文学艺术版权的传统保护以集体作者观作为核心论点。当代民间文学艺术保护热潮背后有文化民族主义的情感支撑。在其影响下,文艺学者刻意区分民间文学与作家文学,建构民间文学所谓“集体性”;法律学者在此基础上进一步虚构所谓集体创作机制、集体作者观;部分学者借用结构主义文学理论、批评个人主义作者观,为民间文学的集体产权观铺路。然而,这种民间文学艺术领域的集体作者观歪曲了著作权法的发展方向。版权法应该放弃集体作者观,而赋予传承人以作者身份,将民间文学艺术作品视为普通作品,按照普通的个人作品加以保护,才能最终解决民间文学的版权难题。 The traditional protection of the copyright of folk literature is based on the notion of collective authorship. The upsurge of folk literature protection is pushed by the emotion of cultural nationalism. Influenced by it, the hterary scholars painstakingly make differences between folk hterature and artist literature, and construct the so called collectivity of folk literature, upon which the legal scholars further invent the collective inditement mechanism and collective authorship notion. Some scholars pave the way for the collective property fight on folk literature by borrowing the structuralist literature theory and criticizing the individualist authorship notion. However the collective authorship notion in the folk literature field distorts the developing direction of copyright law. The notion of collective authorship should be abandoned. It is taking the folk literature as ordinary productions that can ultimately resolve the problem of protecting the copyright of folk literature.
作者 崔国斌
机构地区 清华大学法学院
出处 《法制与社会发展》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第5期67-78,共12页 Law and Social Development
关键词 集体作者观 文化民族主义 集体性 结构主义作者观 个人作品 传承人 the notion of collective authorship cultural naturalist collectivity the stmcturalist notion of authorship the personal production the inheritor
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1D. Paul Schafer. Culture: Beacon of the Future [M]. Adamantine Press Limited, 1998. 被引量:1
  • 2[美]罗素·罗兰 梁光严译.全球化:社会理论和全球文化[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2000.. 被引量:1
  • 3John H. Merryman, Thinking about the Elgin Marbles [J]. Mich. L. Rev. 1985, (83). 被引量:1
  • 4Paul Kuruk. Protecting Folklore Under Modem Intellectual Property Regimes: A Reappraisal of the Tensions Between Individual and Communal Rights in Africa and the United States [J]. American University Law Review, 1999, (April). 被引量:1
  • 5Christine Haight Farley, Protecting Folklore of Indigenous Peoples: Is Intellectual Property the Answer? [J]. Conn. L. Rev.1997, (130). 被引量:1
  • 6刘靖华.全球化背景下的民族主义问题初探[J].现代国际关系,2001(8):36-41. 被引量:26
  • 7Jessica Litman. The Public Domain [J]. Emory L. J., 1990, (39). 被引量:1
  • 8盛洪著..为万世开太平 一个经济学家对文明问题的思考[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1999:301.
  • 9David R. Downes. How Intellectual Property Could Be a Tool to Protect Traditional Knowledge [J]. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 2000. 被引量:1
  • 10Angela R. Riley. Recovering Collectivity: Group Rights to Intellectual Property in Indigenous Communities [J]. Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, 2000. 被引量:1

二级参考文献7

  • 1[1]Ernest Gellner, Nations and Nationalism, Oxford: Basil Blackwell Press,1983,p.10. 被引量:1
  • 2[2]Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism, London: New Left Books,1983,p.14. 被引量:1
  • 3[3]Paul R. Brass, Ethnicity and Nationalism: Theory and Comparison, London: Sage Publications Ltd.1991,p.18. 被引量:1
  • 4[4]James G. Kellas, The Politics of Nationalism and Ethnicity, London: Macllan ltd. Press,1991,p.159. 被引量:1
  • 5[5]Anthony Giddens, The Nation - State and Violence, Cambridge:PolityPress,1985,p.116. 被引量:1
  • 6[6]Liah Greenfeld, Nationalism : Five Roads to Modernity, Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1992,p.15. 被引量:1
  • 7[7]James G. Kellas, The Politics of Nationalism and Ethnicity , St.Martins Press,1994,p.50. 被引量:1

共引文献61

同被引文献513

引证文献52

二级引证文献265

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部