期刊文献+

不同导尿时机对全麻患者苏醒躁动评分的影响 被引量:4

The Comparision of Different Time for Urethral Catheterization on the Sedation Score after Recovery From General Anaesthesia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同导尿时机的选择对全麻患者苏醒后躁动程度的影响。方法选取90例行全麻下腹部手术的男性患者,手术时间均>1h,随机分成3组,A组于术前4h行导尿术,B组于麻醉诱导前行导尿术,C组于麻醉诱导后行导尿术,比较3组患者在麻醉苏醒后及回病房1h后的苏醒躁动评分。结果 3组患者苏醒后躁动率比较有差异,术前4h导尿组的苏醒躁动评分显著低于B组及C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论于手术前4h行导尿术,可以有效的降低患者术后苏醒期发生躁动的概率,对于保护患者安全,减少护理差错有重要意义。 Objective To investigate the differences of sedation score after recovery from general anaesthesia between different time for urethral catheterization.Method 90 patients undergoing abdominal surgery under general anaesthesia was randomly divided into 3 groups,each group contain 30 patient.The operation time was more than 1 hour.Group A:urethral catheterization 4 hours before surgery;Group B:urethral catheterization before anaesthesia induction;Group C:urethral catheterization after anaesthesia induction.Compare the differences of sedationg score at the time of recovery from general anesthesia and 1 hour after surgery in each group.Result The sedation score of group A is obviously lower than that of group B and group C(P<0.05).Conclusion Urethral catheterization 4 hours before surgery can reduce the rate of emergence agitation after recovery from general anesthesia,and is important to protect patient on safety.
作者 石喆
出处 《慢性病学杂志》 2010年第12期1596-1598,共3页 Chronic Pathematology Journal
关键词 麻醉 全身 导尿管插入术 时间因素 人类 Urinary Catheterization Anesthesia,General Time Factors Human
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献14

共引文献288

同被引文献34

  • 1郑秋霞,朱音,陈小敏,陈敏华.Ramsay镇静评分在体外循环术后病人中的应用[J].护理研究(中旬版),2007,21(6):1555-1556. 被引量:37
  • 2廖利民.排尿的中枢神经系统控制//张玉海,赵继懋.神经泌尿学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007,488—491. 被引量:2
  • 3宋波.充盈性膀胱压力测定//金锡御,宋波.I临床尿动力学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:66-67. 被引量:1
  • 4Fayolle-Pivot L, Wey PF, Precloux P, et al. Acute renal failure related to urinary retention following haemorrhoidectomy performed under general anaesthesia and bilateral pudendal nerve block: a case report. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim, 2008, 27: 1019- 1022. 被引量:1
  • 5Singh SK, Agarwal MM, Batra YK, et al. Effect of lumbar-epidural administration of tramadol on lower urinary tract function. Neurourol Urodyn, 2008, 27: 65-70. 被引量:1
  • 6Marinkovic SP, Badlani G. Voiding and sexual dysfunction after cerebrovascular accidents. J Urol, 2001, 165 : 359-370. 被引量:1
  • 7Zhang H, Reitz A, Kollias S, et al. An fMRI study of the role of suprapontine brain structures in the voluntary voiding control in- duced by pelvic floor contraction. Neuroimage, 2005, 24: 174- 180. 被引量:1
  • 8杨拔贤.麻醉//吴在德,吴肇汉,等.外科学.7版.北京:人民卫生出版社.2011:65-82. 被引量:2
  • 9Kadurugamuwa JL, Shaheen E. Inactivation of human enterovirus 71 and coxsackie virus A16 and hand, foot, and mouth disease[J]. Am J Infect Control, 2011,39(9): 788- 789. 被引量:1
  • 10Nguyen VH, Sibounheuang B, Phommasone K, et al. First isolation and genomic characterization of enterovirus A71 and coxsackievirus A16 from hand foot and mouth disease patients in the Lao PDR[J]. New Microbes New Infect, 2014, 2(6) : 170-172. 被引量:1

引证文献4

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部