摘要
通过对美国亚利桑那州和马里兰州的两个水系绿道的建设案例进行分析研究,比较了气候干旱和气候温和地区在各自区域中的建设途径及其对绿色基础设施的贡献。案例的比较研究揭示了在评价绿道对于绿色基础设施建设的贡献时面临的局限性。在何处将相关的元素融入现有城市和郊区场地,以及如何把设计附加于城市和郊区布局中,是案例面临的共同问题。
This paper presents the two case studies of watercourse-associated greenway development in the Arizona State and Maryland State in America and compares the approaches and contributions to arid and temperate areas. The case study indicates the limitations of greenways’ contribution to the green infrastructure and proposes how to integrate the elements and the design into the existing urban and suburban areas are issues that the two case studies encounter.
出处
《风景园林》
2010年第6期26-29,共4页
Landscape Architecture
