期刊文献+

血沉及C反应蛋白判定强直性脊柱炎病情活动的价值 被引量:31

The value of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein in evaluating disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨血沉和C反应蛋白(CRP)判定强直性脊柱炎(AS)病情活动的价值.方法采用Cowling法和Bath强直性脊柱炎病情活动指标(BASDAI)评价126例AS患者的病情活动性,分为静止、可疑活动、活动3个水平;患者分为脊柱组和外周关节组.病情静止和活动者纳入受试者工作曲线,以最高敏感性和特异性决定截断点,计算血沉、CRP与病情活动间Spearman相关系数.结果脊柱组血沉和CRP中位数为25.3 mm/1 h和11.1 mg/L,外周关节组为30.0 mm/1 h和15.0 mg/L.两组间血沉和CRP呈正相关(rs=0.325和0.318,P<0.05).血沉、CRP和两种病情活动评价指标无相关性(0.027~0.282),两者对Cowling法和BASDAI评价病情活动敏感性为39.4%~81.3%,特异性为40.0%~86.7%.结论血沉、CRP与Cowling法和BASDAI评价AS病情活动性之间无联系,其对判定AS病情活动性价值不大. Objective To determine whether erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP) is more appropriate in measuring the disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods We studied 126 consecutive patients with AS. The external criteria for disease activity were Cowling clinical assessment of disease activity and the Bath AS disease activity index (BASDAI). In each measure we defined 3 levels of disease activity i. e. no activity, ambiguous activity and definite activity. The patients with AS were divided into 2 groups: those with spinal involvement only and those with peripheral arthritis as well. For each criterion of disease activity, the patients without activity and with definite activity were included in receiver operating characteristic curve, which was used to determine cutoff values with the highest sensitivity and specificity. We also calculated Spearman correlation. Results The median ESR and CRP were 25.3 mm/l h and 11.1 mg/L in the spinal group and 30.0mm/l h and 15.0 mg/L in the peripheral group. In both groups the Spearman correlation coefficients between ESR and CRP were around 0. 30. There was no correlation between ESR, CRP, and the 2 disease activity variables ( 0.027-0.282 ). Sensitivity for both ESR and CRP was between 39.4 % and 81.3% for Cowling assessment of disease activity and the BASDAI, while specificity was between 40.0% and 86.7% for all disease activity measures. Conclusion It is concluded that neither ESR nor CRP is superior for assessing disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis.
出处 《中华内科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第8期566-569,共4页 Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine
关键词 脊柱炎 强直性 血沉 C反应蛋白质 受试者工作曲线 C反应蛋白(CRP) Bath强直性脊柱炎 病情活动性 价值 外周关节 活动指标 Spondylitis, ankylosing Blood sedimentation C-reactive protein Receiver operating characteristic curve
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1张克坚,杨振华.应用ROC曲线图评价检验项目的临床准确性[J].临床检验信息导报,1998,5(4):105-112. 被引量:20
  • 2Taylor HG, Wardle T, Beswick E J, et al. The relationship of clinical and laboratory measurements to radiological change in AS. Br J Rheumatol, 1991,30:330-335. 被引量:1
  • 3Ruof J, Stucki G. Validity aspects of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein in ankylosing spondylitis: a literature review.J Rheumatol, 1999,26 : 966-970. 被引量:1
  • 4Cowling P, Ebringer R, Cawdell D, et al. C-reactive protein ,ESR, and klebsiella in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis,1980,39:45-49. 被引量:1
  • 5Garrett SL, Jenkinson TR, Whitelock HC, et al. A new approach to denning disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). J Rheumatol, 1994,21:2286-2291. 被引量:1
  • 6Wolfe F. Comparative usefulness of C-reactive protein anderythrocyte sed imentation rate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol, 1997,24 : 1477-1485. 被引量:1
  • 7Spoorenberg A, van der Heijde D, de Klerk E, et al. Relative value of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein in assessment of disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol, 1999,26:980-984. 被引量:1
  • 8Sheehan N J, Slavin BM, Donovan MP, et al. Lack of correlation between clinical disease activity and erythrocyte sedimentation rate,acute phase proteins or protease inhibitors in ankylosing spondylitis.Br J Rheumatol, 1986,25 : 171-174. 被引量:1
  • 9杨春花,黄烽.高敏C反应蛋白研究进展[J].中华风湿病学杂志,2004,8(12):755-758. 被引量:20
  • 10Dougados M, Gueguen A, Nakache Jp, et al. Clinical relevance of C-reactive protein in axial involvement of ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol, 1999,26 : 971-974. 被引量:1

二级参考文献1

共引文献38

同被引文献337

引证文献31

二级引证文献219

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部