摘要
目的比较鱼腥草和庆大霉素雾化吸入治疗急性喉炎的疗效。方法选择急性喉炎患者共100例,随机分为两组,鱼腥草组50例,庆大霉素组50例,分别用鱼腥草和庆大霉素注射液配合地塞米松注射液进行雾化吸入治疗,2次/d,连续治疗3d。治疗前后进行临床和实验室检查,观察疗效和安全性。结果鱼腥草、庆大霉素雾化吸入治疗急性喉炎的疗效间差异无显著性意义。结论鱼腥草雾化吸入治疗急性喉炎疗效显著,无毒副作用,可反复使用。
Objective To compare the effectiveness of the ultrasonic nebuligation of herba houttuyniae and gentamycine for acute laryngitis in adults. Methods 100 cases of acute laryngitis were randomly assigned to receive either herba houttuyniae （4 ml mixed dexamethasonum 5 rag, twice daily） or gentamycin injection （2 ml mixed dexamethasonum 5 mg twice daily） for 3 days （6 times）. Pre or post - treatment, the clinical and laboratory examination were done, and the efficacy and safety were assessed at the end of treatment. Results The efficient rate were 96% for the 50 patients who received herba houttuyniae and 94% for the 50 patients who received gentamycine after 3 days （6 times） of the treatment （ P 〉 0.05）. The difference between them was not significant. Conclusion The ultrasonic nebuligation of herba houttuyniae is more effective for acute laryngitis, it is has poison or side e effect, can be used repeatedly.
出处
《中国全科医学》
CAS
CSCD
2005年第15期1262-1263,共2页
Chinese General Practice
关键词
喉炎
鱼腥草
庆大霉素
Laryngitis
Herba houttuyniae
Gentamycine
