期刊文献+

盟军最高统帅部对“霸王”行动的抉择和分歧

The Supreme Command in the Last Preparatory Stage of "Overlord" Operation:Divergence & Choice
下载PDF
导出
摘要 诺曼底战役前夕,欧洲盟军最高统帅部就战略空军在“霸王”行动中的任务和作用展开争论,制定并完善了“轰炸战略”决策。关于“铁砧”行动的取舍所进行的争论深受英美两国战略分歧的影响,使最高统帅部未能作出最佳决策。艾森豪维尔对诺曼底战役后的进攻战略虽有规划,但未能进行讨论,从而埋下了未来争论的种子。 The pre-D-Day, “Bombing Strategy” decision was made and perfected in the Supreme Command by way of argument about task and affect of the strategic air force in “Overlord”. The supreme commander could not make the best choice about “Anvil” for fall into an argument with Churchill. About future strategy after Normandy campaign,Eisenhower worked out the conception of “Broad Front” strategy, but not discussed in the supreme command. Factor of argument was left over.
作者 李积顺
出处 《武汉大学学报(人文科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第4期438-444,共7页 Wuhan University Journal (Humanity Sciences)
关键词 盟军最高统帅部 “霸王”行动 “铁砧”行动 “宽大正面”战略 the Supreme Command~ “Overlord” operation “Anvil”operation 'Broad Front'strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1ROSTOW,W · W. Pre-Invasion Bombing Strategy, General Eisenhower's Decision of March 25,1944[M]. Austin,1981. 被引量:1
  • 2CHANDLER,Alfred D. The Papers of Dwight David Eisenhower, The War Years Ⅲ[M]. Baltimore and London,1970. 被引量:1
  • 3TEFFER,Authur. With Prejudice The War Memoirs of Marshal of the Royal Air Force Lord Tedder[M]. London,1966. 被引量:1
  • 4[英]戴维·欧文 张德广 译.盟军高级司令部内幕[M].北京:新华出版社,1986.. 被引量:1
  • 5BUTCHER,Harry C. My Three Years with Eisenhower[M]. New York,1946. 被引量:1
  • 6DWIGHT,D. Eisenhower. Eisenhower's Own Story of the War[M]. New York,1946. 被引量:1
  • 7[美]德怀特·艾森豪威尔 樊迪译.远征陆欧[M].北京:三联书店,1975.. 被引量:1
  • 8[美]克莱尔·布莱尔 廉怡之译.将军百战归:布雷德利自传[M].北京:军事译文出版社,1985.. 被引量:1
  • 9WEIGLEY, Rusell F. Eisenhower's Lieutenants, the Compaign of France and German 1944- 1945 [M].Bloomington, 1981. 被引量:1
  • 10POGUE, Forrest C. United States Army in World War Ⅱ, The European Theater of Operations, The Supreme Command[M]. Washington D. C. ,1954. 被引量:1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部