期刊文献+

英语专业教师课堂指令性言语行为研究 被引量:24

A Survey of English Teachers’ Directives in the Language Classroom
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究是对英语专业教师课堂指令性言语行为的实证研究.通过课堂录音、课堂观察以及现场记录的方法收集语料,运用社会语言学理论和方法对其结构形式、使用特征和数量,及其与学生的英语水平、教师的教学方法、责任心、教学效果等因素之间的关系进行了分析讨论.结果发现:教师课堂指令的形式主要与学生的英语水平、教学内容的难度和教师个人的性别及性格有关;指令的数量主要与教师的责任心及教学方法有关;直接指令的使用比例随年级的升高而降低,而间接指令的比例随年级的升高而升高;课堂指令的数量明显地影响师生互动及语言课堂的教学效果,指令的形式对课堂教学的影响不明显.研究表明:教师发出足量的、恰当的课堂指令,有助于充分地激活学生的课堂学习积极性,增强师生互动,提高语言课堂的教学效果. Teachers' speech acts play a significant role in classroom teaching. The paper, focusing on English teachers' directives in the language classroom, attempts to make an analysis of their forms and distributional features on the basis of classroom recording, observation and note-taking. The main findings are: 1) teachers' use of directives correlates with the students' English proficiency, teaching focus and methods, and teachers' personality; 2)a general tendency is found that the percentage of teachers' direct directives decreases with the growth of the students' grade, but that of the indirect directives increases with it; 3)it is the quantity rather than the forms of teachers' directives in class that mainly has a direct and decisive influence on teacher-student interaction and classroom teaching effects. A conclusion is drawn at the end: a sufficient amount of appropriate directives contributes to motivating students' active participation in classroom learning and thus makes classroom teaching more effective and productive.
作者 郭林花
出处 《山东外语教学》 2005年第3期40-43,53,共5页 Shandong Foreign Language Teaching
关键词 言语行为 课堂指令 话语形式 师生互动 教学效果 speech acts classroom directives utterance form teacher-student interaction teaching effects
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献14

  • 1Allwright, D. 1984. The importance of interaction in classroom language learning [J]. Applied Linguistics 5: 156-171. 被引量:1
  • 2Blum-Kulka, S. 1989. Playing it safe the role of conventionality in indirectness [A]. In S. Blum-Kulka et al (eds.) . Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies [C]. Alex Publishing Corporation. 被引量:1
  • 3Blum-Kulka, S. 1990. You don't touch lettuce with your fingers: Parental politeness in family discourse [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 259-288. 被引量:1
  • 4Brown, P. & S. Levinson. 1978. Universals in language use: politeness phenomena [A]. In E. N. Boody (ed). Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Interaction [C]. Cambridge: CUP. 被引量:1
  • 5Brown, P. & S. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage [A]. Studies in International Sociolinguistics 4 [C]. Cambridge:CUP. 被引量:1
  • 6Ervin-Tripp, S., J. Guo & M. Lampert. 1990. Politeness and persuasion in children's control acts [J].Journal of Pragmatics 14/2: 307-331. 被引量:1
  • 7Faerch, C. & G. Kasper. 1989. Internal and external modification in interlanguage request realization[A].In S. Blum-Kulka et al (eds.). 被引量:1
  • 8Fraser, B. 1980. Perspectives on politeness [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 4: 341-350. 被引量:1
  • 9Hill, B., S. Ikuta, A. Kawasaki & T. Ogino. 1986.Universals of linguistic politeness: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English [J].Journal of Pragmatics 10: 347-371. 被引量:1
  • 10Leech, G. N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics [M].London: Longrnan Group Ltd. 被引量:1

共引文献96

同被引文献112

引证文献24

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部