摘要
紧急状态法是在戒严法的基础上发展起来的,同时又克服了戒严法的缺陷。它有利于各国有效地运用紧急权应对危机,并且在适当限制公民权利的前提下最低限度地保障公民权利。但是,围绕着紧急状态的争议依然是某些戒严观念的延伸。分析了西方法治国家中两种很有影响的紧急状态观念及其实践。紧急状态制度的变革不仅源于社会现实的要求,它也源于认识观念的变革。最后结合宪法的修改对中国的紧急状态法律进行评论。
Emergency law is developed on the basis of martial law in which overcomes some limitations. It is favorable to the dealing with crisis exerting emergency power, and minimally ensure civil rights on the premise of restricting civil rights properly. However, the argument on emergency is still the stretch of some conception of martial law. This article analyses two important conceptions and practice on state of emergency in western country. The authors consider that the reform of the system on state of emergency derives from both the requirement of social reality and the reform of conception. Finally, this article makes some reviews of China's emergency law in the context of constitutional modification.
出处
《石家庄经济学院学报》
2005年第3期370-374,共5页
Journal of Shijiazhuang University of Economics
