期刊文献+

Soil Organic Carbon Density in Hebei Province, China: Estimates and Uncertainty 被引量:18

Soil Organic Carbon Density in Hebei Province, China: Estimates and Uncertainty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In order to improve the precision of soil organic carbon (SOC) estimates, the sources of uncertainty in soil organic carbon density (SOCD) estimates and SOC stocks were examined using 363 soil profiles in Hebei Province, China, with three methods: the soil profile statistics (SPS), GIS-based soil type (GST), and kriging interpolation (KI). The GST method, utilizing both pedological professional knowledge and GIS technology, was considered the most accurate method of the three estimations, with SOCD estimates for SPS 10% lower and KI 10% higher. The SOCD range for GST was 84% wider than KI as KI smoothing effect narrowed the SOCD range. Nevertheless, the coefficient of variation for SOCD with KI (41.7%) was less than GST and SPS. Comparing SOCD’s lower estimates for SPS versus GST, the major sources of uncertainty were the conflicting area of proportional relations. Meanwhile, the fewer number of soil profiles and the necessity of using the smoothing effect with KI were its sources of uncertainty. Moreover, for local detailed variations of SOCD, GST was more advantageous in reflecting the distribution pattern than KI. In order to improve the precision of soil organic carbon (SOC) estimates, the sources of uncertainty in soil organic carbon density (SOCD) estimates and SOC stocks were examined using 363 soil profiles in Hebei Province, China, with three methods: the soil profile statistics (SPS), GIS-based soil type (GST), and kriging interpolation (KI). The GST method, utilizing both pedological professional knowledge and GIS technology, was considered the most accurate method of the three estimations, with SOCD estimates for SPS 10% lower and KI 10% higher. The SOCD range for GST was 84% wider than KI as KI smoothing effect narrowed the SOCD range. Nevertheless, the coefficient of variation for SOCD with KI (41.7%) was less than GST and SPS. Comparing SOCD's lower estimates for SPS versus GST, the major sources of uncertainty were the conflicting area of proportional relations. Meanwhile, the fewer number of soil profiles and the necessity of using the smoothing effect with KI were its sources of uncertainty. Moreover, for local detailed variations of SOCD, GST was more advantageous in reflecting the distribution pattern than KI.
出处 《Pedosphere》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2005年第3期293-300,共8页 土壤圈(英文版)
基金 Project supported by the Knowledge Innovation Project in Leading Edge Fields, Chinese Academy of Sciences(No. ISSASIP0201), the National Key Basic Research Support Foundation of China (No. G1999011810) and the KnowledgeInnovation Project in Resource and
关键词 professional pedological knowledge-based database (PKD) soil organic carbon (SOC) soil profile database (SPD) soil profile statistics (SPS) UNCERTAINTY 河北 土壤有机碳密度 不确定度 专业土壤知识数据库 类型统计
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献32

共引文献612

同被引文献232

引证文献18

二级引证文献266

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部